Appendix D. Accuracy of Pi Model

The transfer function H for a transmission line may be expressed in terms of the Taylor-series approximation for the exponential function.

Equation D.1

graphics/xdequ01.gif

where

g is the propagation coefficient for the transmission line (complex nepers/m), and

 

l is the length of the line (m).

The inverse of this function is similarly defined for negative exponents:

Equation D.2

graphics/xdequ02.gif

 

Taking only the first four terms of each expression, you can derive approximate formulas for the forms of H used in the calculation of system gain (Appendix C).

Equation D.3

graphics/xdequ03.gif

 

Equation D.4

graphics/xdequ04.gif

 

Now substitute approximations [D.3] and [D.4] into the expression for the gain of a fully configured transmission system [C.17].

Equation D.5

graphics/xdequ05.gif

 

The next calculations compare [D.5] with the expression for the gain of a pi-model circuit in Section 3.4.2, Figure 3.4. The two-port transmission matrix for the pi-model circuit, fully configured with source and load impedances Z S and Z L respectively, is a composite of five two-port mini-models. The first (leftmost) matrix represents the series-connected source impedance. The next three represent the components in the pi-model. The last matrix represents the shunt-connected load impedance.

Equation D.6

graphics/xdequ06.gif

 

The expression for the circuit gain follows :

Equation D.7

graphics/xdequ07.gif

 

Next use the definitions of graphics/744equ01.gif and graphics/744equ02.gif to derive the following substitutions:

Equation D.8

graphics/xdequ08.gif

 

Equation D.9

graphics/xdequ09.gif

 

Plugging these new substitutions back into [D.7] leads to the following expression for the gain of the pi-model circuit.

Equation D.10

graphics/xdequ10.gif

 

Comparing [D.10] with [D.5] reveals a perfect match of all zero-, first-, and second-order terms, with the lowest -order difference showing up in the third-order part of the expression. Assuming a small value of the propagation coefficient l g < 1/4, and thereby an overall gain somewhere near unity, you might reasonably conclude that the modeling error should not exceed the difference between [D.5] and [D.10]

Equation D.11

graphics/xdequ11.gif

 

Further assuming the ratios Z S /(2 Z C ) and Z C / Z L to each be less than 3.8, the resulting pi-model error (measured as a function of frequency) should remain less than 1%.

As the coefficient l g grows, so grows the error in proportion to (at least) the third power of l g . At a value of l g < 1/2, you should expect a modeling accuracy no better than 1 part in 10.

Fundamentals

Transmission Line Parameters

Performance Regions

Frequency-Domain Modeling

Pcb (printed-circuit board) Traces

Differential Signaling

Generic Building-Cabling Standards

100-Ohm Balanced Twisted-Pair Cabling

150-Ohm STP-A Cabling

Coaxial Cabling

Fiber-Optic Cabling

Clock Distribution

Time-Domain Simulation Tools and Methods

Points to Remember

Appendix A. Building a Signal Integrity Department

Appendix B. Calculation of Loss Slope

Appendix C. Two-Port Analysis

Appendix D. Accuracy of Pi Model

Appendix E. erf( )

Notes



High-Speed Signal Propagation[c] Advanced Black Magic
High-Speed Signal Propagation[c] Advanced Black Magic
ISBN: 013084408X
EAN: N/A
Year: 2005
Pages: 163

Flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net