4.10.1 Proof of Proposition 4.1 in Section 4.4We follow the technique used in [203] by defining the function Equation 4.184   Notice that Equation 4.185   Equation 4.186   Equation 4.187   Equation 4.188    where (4.188) follows from the assumption that   y   '(  x  )  Equation 4.189   we obtain Equation 4.190   Assume that the penalty function r ( x ) is convex and bounded from below; then the cost function C ( q ) is convex and has a unique minimum C ( q *). Therefore, q * is the unique solution to (4.15) such that z ( q *) = . Since the sequence C ( q l ) is decreasing and bounded from below, it converges. Therefore, from (4.190) we have Equation 4.191    Since for any realization of  r  , the probability that  z  (   q     l   ) falls in the null space of the matrix (  SR   -1   S   T  ) is zero, then (4.191) implies that  z  (   q     l   )  4.10.2 Proof of Proposition 4.2 in Section 4.5 Denote  Equation 4.192    Denote  Equation 4.193   Using (4.192) and (4.193), we obtain Equation 4.194   Equation 4.195   Equation 4.196    where in (4.194)  Equation 4.197    It follows from (4.197) that the  k  th diagonal element  Equation 4.198    |