14.4 Static Member Variables

I l @ ve RuBoard

14.4 Static Member Variables

Suppose you want to keep a running count of the number of stacks in use at any given time. One way to do this is to create a global variable stack_count that is incremented in the stack constructor and decremented in the destructor:

 int stack_count = 0; // Number of stacks currently in use class stack {     private:         int count;         // Number of items in the stack         // ... member variables     public:         int data_count;  // Number of items in the stack         // ... member variables         stack(  ) {             // We just created a stack             ++stack_count;             count = 0;         }         ~stack(  ) {             // We now have one less stack             --stack_count;         }         // ... other member functions }; 

Note that stack_count is a single global variable. No matter how many different stacks you create, there is one and only one stack_count .

Although this system works, it has some drawbacks. The definition of the class stack contains everything about the stack, except the variable stack_count . It would be nice to put stack_count in the class, but if you define it as a member variable, you'll get a new copy of stack_count each time you declare a stack class variable.

C++ has a special modifier for member variables: static . This tells C++ that one and only one variable is to be defined for the class:

 class stack {     private:         static int stack_count; // Number of stacks currently in use         int count;         // Number of items in the stack         // ... member variables     public:         stack(  ) {             // We just created a stack             ++stack_count;             count = 0;         }         ~stack(  ) {             // We now have one less stack             --stack_count;         }         // ... other member functions }; 

This new version looks almost the same as the global variable version. There is, however, one thing missing: the initialization of stack_count . This is done with the statement:

 int stack::stack_count = 0; // No stacks have been defined 

The difference between static and nonstatic member variables is that member variables belong to the object, while static member variables belong to the class. Thus if you create three stack s, you get three copies of the ordinary member variable data_count . However, since there is only one definition of the class, only one stack_count is created.

So if you have:

 stack a_stack; stack b_stack; 

a_stack.stack_count is the same as b_stack.stack_count . There is only one stack_count for the class stack. C++ allows you to access static member variables using the syntax:

 <   class   >::<   variable   > 

Thus you can get to stack_count with the statement:

 std::cout << "The number of active stacks is " <<                stack::stack_count << '\n'; 

(Or at least you could if stack_count was not private.)

You can use the dot notation ( a_stack.stack_count ), but this is considered poor programming style. That's because it implies that stack_count belongs to the object a_stack . But because it's static , the variable belongs to the class stack .

I l @ ve RuBoard