The vast majority of electronic messages that executives receive are relatively routine. But there are some that qualify as "smoking e- mails ," which have the potential to ignite a full-fledged blaze. These are the ones that require careful handling. We suggest that, while crafting your response to a potentially incendiary e-mail message, you run through the checklist provided in Figure 6-1.
If you are the recipient of a "smoking e-mail," the following checklist can help you to defuse it. As you prepare your response, ask yourself these questions:
How do I assess our relationship: Is the sender of this e-mail a double- dealer , opponent, loyal opponent , or partner? Given his/her position, what is the best way to frame your response?
What information is the sender trying to convey ? What feelings are behind the message?
Do I need to ask the sender for clarification before I can respond?
How can I best paraphrase the sender's message so that he/she is aware that I've gotten both the objective and emotional messages?
Is my response clear and to the point? If I want the recipient to take action, is that clearly stated up front?
Have I stated my case/made my requests in an objective, nonjudgmental way, or does my response contain hidden messages and veiled accusations?
Are the language and references that I have used appropriate, given the ethnic background, religion, and physical location of the person I'm responding to?
Does my response include any confidential information that should not be shared with the individual to whom I'm writing?
How would I react if I were the recipient of this response?
Who, if anyone , should receive a copy of my response? Why do I want him/her/them to see my response? What will be the possible repercussions if I send copies to these people?
Is there any way in which I can make my response friendlier or more personal?
Would it be appropriate to include some positive feedback in my response?
Is the response I'm preparing more likely to increase or decrease the tension level between me and the sender?
Would it be better to try to resolve this issue over the telephone or in a face-to-face meeting than in an e-mail?