AKA | AKA ANOVA, Hypothesis Testing (ANOVA), F-Test |
Classification | Analyzing/Trending (AT) |
The analysis of variance is an inferential statistical technique designed to test for significance of the differences among two or more sample means. Some applications include the ability to make inferences about the population from which the samples were drawn, to identify differences or variations in statistical process control (SPC) analyses, and to provide for analysis and comparison of factorial designs in design of experiments (DOE).
To identify differences or variance in productivity, quality, methods, factorial designs, performance, and many other applications.
To check for variation among sample or group means.
To perform hypothesis testing on interval (quantitative) data sets.
→ | Select and define problem or opportunity |
→ | Identify and analyze causes or potential change |
Develop and plan possible solutions or change | |
→ | Implement and evaluate solution or change |
→ | Measure and report solution or change results |
Recognize and reward team efforts |
1 | Research/statistics |
Creativity/innovation | |
2 | Engineering |
Project management | |
Manufacturing | |
Marketing/sales | |
Administration/documentation | |
Servicing/support | |
Customer/quality metrics | |
3 | Change management |
before
Variance Analysis
Standard Deviation
Process Capability Ratios
Normal Probability Destribution
Descriptive Statistics
after
Problem specification
Work flow analysis (WFA)
Prioritization matrix
Process analysis
Problem analysis
Definition: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a technique often applied in the field of inferential statistics to test whether the means of more than two quantative data sets of samples or populations differ.
Variance analysis:
Refer to the hypothesis testing procedure (see tool 92). The analysis of variance test is frequently used in testing hypotheses.
Partial analysis of variance (ANOVA) distribution table— critical values at the .05 level of significance. (Refer to the Appendix, Table C for complete ANOVA critical values table.)
F-Distribution: 05 One-Tail, 10 Two-Tail Test
STEP 1 First, daily product defect rates are collected on three different methods of production. See example Three Production Methods and Their Daily Product Defect Rates.
STEP 2 The Null Hypothesis (H0) is stated: There is no statistically significant difference in the daily product defect rates and the production methods used measured at .05 alpha (level of sigificance) using a one tailed F-test (ANOVA).
STEP 3 The eight-step hypothesis testing procedure is used to arrive at a decision (see Hypothesis Testing [CHI-square] for example).
STEP 4 The calcultions are performed in this example.
Note | The analysis of variance calculations are time consuming and often difficult to calculate. Any basic software program on statistics will perform calculations and provide a printout similar to that shown in this example. |
STEP 5 Finally, the test result is verified against the critical value located in the ANOVA distribution table (notes and key points). On the basis of the test result F-ratio = 5.74 and the critical value = 3.89 (which is lower), the Null Hypothesis (H0) is rejected. There is a statistically significant difference in the three production methods and their daily product defect rates.
Three Production Methods and Their Daily Product Defect Rates
Three Production Methods and Their Daily Product Defect Rates (continued)