AKA | N/A |
Classification | Data Collecting (DC) |
The activity cost matrix is a useful cost data collection tool for the purpose of planning and budget preparation. In order to identify which personnel are involved in a major project, direct and supporting activities are listed and percent contribution estimated for each contributor.
To determine departmental activities and associated cost data.
To schedule personnel for completing specific project activities.
To compare the ratio of contribution (effort) against the total project budget.
Select and define problem or opportunity | |
→ | Identify and analyze causes or potential change |
→ | Develop and plan possible solutions or change |
→ | Implement and evaluate solution or change |
Measure and report solution or change results | |
Recognize and reward team efforts |
Research/statistics | |
Creativity/innovation | |
3 | Engineering |
1 | Project management |
4 | Manufacturing |
Marketing/sales | |
2 | Administration/documentation |
Servicing/support | |
Customer/quality metrics | |
Change management |
before
Information needs analysis
Data collection strategy
Interview technique
Audience analysis
Time study sheet
after
Deployment chart (down-across)
Action plan
Monthly assessment schedule
Gantt chart
Major program status
Use actual timekeeping data from previous project closing documentation to estimate percent cost of the various activities.
To increase the validity of data to be stated in the activity cost matrix, department sources or subject matter experts (SME) should be contacted for specific information.
STEP 1 The first step requires a search for a previously completed project's historical data. Timekeeping (activity time) and cost data will greatly assist in the completing of an activity cost matrix. See example Training Activities—Percent Cost.
STEP 2 Interviews are conducted with department personnel or subject matter experts. Information on percent contribution to total project effort is collected.
STEP 3 Lastly, an activity cost matrix is completed and dated as shown in this example.
STEP 4 A copy is given to all involved parties for their review and feedback.
Training Activities — Percent Cost
Date: xx/xx/xx | Responsibility — % Contribution | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analyst: A. Fisher | User | User — SME | Training analyst | Training developer | Training instructor | Training administrator | Graphic arts | Reproduction | Budgeting and finance | Facilities | |
1 | Training course request | 2 | 5 | 10 | |||||||
3 | User needs analysis | 5 | 5 | 20 | |||||||
4 | Training proposal | 20 | 5 | 2 | 90 | 5 | |||||
5 | User task analysis | 15 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 5 | ||||
7 | Workshop development | 20 | 60 | ||||||||
7.3 | Graphics and aids | 2 | 3 | 2 | 96 | 5 | 5 | ||||
7.9 | Formative evaluation | 50 | 13 | 10 | |||||||
8 | Pilot workshop | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |||||
10 | Workshop revision | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
11 | Train-the-trainer | 5 | 5 | 20 | 5 | ||||||
12 | Workshop participation | 70 | 5 | 70 | |||||||
13 | Summitive evaluation | 5 | 2 | 5 | |||||||
15 | Scheduling and administration | 3 | 3 | 80 | 3 | 5 | 90 | ||||
15.2 | Material reproduction | 2 | 5 | 80 | |||||||
17 | Master copy control | 5 | 3 | 6 | |||||||
Total contribution | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Note:SME = Subject Matter Experts |