Tool 192: Surveying


AKA

Survey Analysis

Classification

Data Collecting (DC)

Tool description

The surveying technique is used to collect large amounts of written or verbal data from customers, employees, or other sources in a very objective, efficient, and organized manner. Applied survey methods such as questionnaires, interviews, observations, and focus groups can provide great flexibility in format and content and usually use data collection instruments that have a high degree of validity and reliability. The type of survey to be used is determined by a team or researcher.

Typical application

  • To collect data for the purpose of solving problems, verifying customer satisfaction, or comparing performance against organizational goals.

  • To collect data from a large group of employees to verify job satisfaction, employee morale, or communication problems among organizational units.

  • To obtain data, general to specific, on customer perception of quality on products or services.

  • To acquire benchmarking information and "best practices" data.

Problem-solving phase

Select and define problem or opportunity

Identify and analyze causes or potential change

Develop and plan possible solutions or change

Implement and evaluate solution or change

Measure and report solution or change results

Recognize and reward team efforts

Typically used by

1

Research/statistics

Creativity/innovation

Engineering

Project management

Manufacturing

3

Marketing/sales

Administration/documentation

4

Servicing/support

2

Customer/quality metrics

5

Change management

start sidebar
links to other tools

before

  • Data Collection Strategy

  • Random Numbers Generator

  • Interview Technique

  • Questionnaires

  • Observation

after

  • Frequency Distribution (FD)

  • Responses Data Encoding Form

  • Thematic Content Analysis

  • Descriptive Statistics

  • Hypothesis Testing (Chi-Square)

end sidebar

Notes and key points

Comparison of Survey Methods

Advantages

Mailed Questionnaires

Mass Administered Questionnaires

Face-to-Face Interviews

Self-Administered Questionnaires (Face-to-Face)

Telephone Interviews

  • Low cost

High

Med.

Low

Low

Med.

  • Speed

Low

High

Low

Low

High

  • Anonymity

High

Med.

Low

Med.

Low

  • Immediate response—no time pressure

High

Med.

Low

Med.

Low

  • Ability to obtain a valid sample from the population[*]

Low

Low

High

High

Med.

  • No interviewer bias

High

Med.

Low

Med.

Low

  • Establishing rapport with respondent

Low

Med.

High

Med.

Med.

  • Ability to ask complex questions

Low

Med.

High

Med.

Med.

  • Ability to get full, detailed responses

Low

Low

High

Low

Med.

[*]Note: Always refer to a sample size determination table.

Step-by-step procedure

  • STEP 1 A team determines the specific data needed and identifies the data source, and defines the population to be sampled and surveyed.

  • STEP 2 Team consensus is reached on the type of survey to be used (questionnaires, interviews, observations, focus groups) and the formatting of the data collection instrument.

  • STEP 3 A survey instrument is developed and field-tested on the basis of valid instrument construction guidelines. See example Development of Customer Satisfaction Surveys.

  • STEP 4 Refer to a more detailed description of the development and administration of the following types of surveys and related tools in this handbook:

    — Questionnaires

    — Data collection strategy

    — Interview technique

    — Sampling methods

    — Observation

    — Random numbers generator

    — Focus group

    — Response data encoding form

Example of tool application

Development of Customer Satisfaction Surveys

Survey Instrument Goal: To obtain written responses on a particular product or service
Survey Instrument Design Considerations:

  1. Keep the instrument short. Only ask questions that are absolutely necessary.

  2. Restrict the instrument to a single issue, if possible.

  3. Provide a cover letter that explains the purpose of the survey, respondent selection process, and the issue of confidentiality. State the return date.

  4. Write explicit instructions on how to answer the questions for the respondent.

  5. Utilize terms that are clearly understood. Avoid loaded words and phrases, avoid jargon.

  6. Determine how response data will be analyzed, tested, and displayed.

  7. Avoid rank order questions; difficult to analyze.

  8. Encode each response when using rating scales.

  9. Development of questions:

    • Start with nonthreatening, easy to answer.

    • Use general before specific.

    • Use open-ended only if all possible responses are not known.

    • Use multiple-choice for increased date volume.

    • Phrase in positive, rather than in the negative.

    • Avoid researcher bias or prejudice when phrasing.

  10. Pretest the instrument for reliability and content validity.




Six Sigma Tool Navigator(c) The Master Guide for Teams
Six Sigma Tool Navigator: The Master Guide for Teams
ISBN: 1563272954
EAN: 2147483647
Year: 2005
Pages: 326

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net