Flylib.com

Books Software

 
 
 

Preface to the Second Edition

   

Preface to the Second Edition

By Dean Leffingwell

Much has transpired since the first edition of this text was published in 1999. The "dot.com" bubble economy of the late 1990s (driven in part by the Internet, software, and related technology) has burst, causing significant disruption, economic uncertainty, and chaos in the lives of many. And yet, perhaps order and sanity have been restored to a free market that appeared to have "lost its wits" for a time.

However, innovation in software technology continues unabated, and the industry as a whole is still growing rapidly . The global reach of the Internet continues to change our lives and drive new, varied forms of communication, from the global electronic marketplaces that facilitate the exchange of goods and services to the after-school instant messaging chat-fests that seem to absorb our children's homework time and so much of that expensive Internet bandwidth we rolled out in the last decade .

We are connected to our business associates , friends , and family 24/7. Internet cafes in Australia, in Scotland, and on Alaska-bound cruise ships are open 24 hours a day. We receive e- mails on our PDAs at the grocery store. We can't make breakfast , drive to work, ride an elevator, or enter an office building without interacting with software. Software has become the embodiment of much of the world's intellectual knowledge, and the business of developing and deploying software has emerged as one of the world's most important industries.

Software development practices continue to march forward as well. The Unified Modeling Language (UML), adopted as late as 1997, is now the de facto means to communicate architecture, patterns, and design mechanisms. The Rational Unified Process and similar processes based on the UML are being adopted by many in the industry as the standard way to approach the challenge of software development.

Our personal lives have changed also. After four years at Rational Software, recently acquired by IBM, I have moved on to helping independent software companies achieve their goals. Some teams hope to change the world; some hope to have a significant impact on individual lives by improving health care; still others hope to improve their customers' manufacturing efficiencies or to help businesses grow by translating product data into other languages. However, these teams all have one thing in common: they are challenged by the difficulty of defining software solutions in a way that can be understood by themselves , by their customers, by their marketing teams, by their internal development and testing teams ”indeed, by all those who must understand the proposed solution at the right level of detail so that the proper results can be achieved. Fail to do that and they fail to achieve their mission. Because of the importance of their mission on their personal lives as well as those whose products they are intended to help, failure is not an option.

Therefore, while much has changed in the software industry in just a few short years, some things, including the challenge of Managing Software Requirements , remain largely the same, and so our work continues in this, the second edition.

   
   

About the Second Edition

The motivation for the content changes in the second edition is based on different yet convergent factors.

The first set of factors is based on the success of the book in the marketplace , which has generated many positive comments and much encouragement, as well as constructive criticisms. While comments range widely, two consistent themes emerged.

  • The "more use cases" theme. The first edition (subtitled A Unified Approach ) reconciled and combined two major viewpoints on requirements techniques. The first, perhaps a more traditional approach, described the way in which requirements specifications are created and detailed to prescribe system behavior using declarative techniques ("the system shall . . ."). The second, the use case approach, described the way in which use cases could be used to define the majority of the functional behavior of the system. We combined these techniques in the first edition in order to create a common, and hopefully more holistic, approach. Based on feedback, we did achieve some success. However, one criticism of the work is that, while we recommended and described the use case method, we did not go far enough in helping the reader develop or apply this technique. Moreover, in presenting both techniques, we confused some readers who wanted to better understand which technique to apply and when.

  • The "it's a big book with many techniques ” please be more prescriptive" theme . The first edition of this book was intended to be a comprehensive work, a one-stop -shopping reference for any technique readers might need to define requirements for a system of any type. We hope this provided value to our readers because we truly believe that there is no "one size fits all" solution to each specific software engineering challenge. And yet, the reviewers' theme remains: "Does it have to be this hard? Can't you be more prescriptive?"

A second set of factors driving this same theme is based on my own experiences in using the book as I work with companies to help them achieve their software development objectives. Some have software applications that require multiple techniques; some can make time for a fairly rigorous introduction to a full requirements management discipline. However, others need to document a specific set of requirements for a specific software application and they need to do so immediately . Starting tomorrow. There is no time or interest in a debate about which technique might be more effective or about the nuances of anything. "Just give me one technique, make it simple, and get me started right now," they say.

Fortunately, these two sets of inputs are mostly convergent and the answer to both is fairly clear. For most teams , in most circumstances, a combination of (1) a well- considered Vision document, (2) an identification and elaboration of the key use cases to be implemented, and (3) a supplementary specification of the nonfunctional requirements is adequate and appropriate for managing software requirements . In addition, if this is the chosen method, the elaborated use cases can directly become the foundation for system testing.

To this end, this second edition of Managing Software Requirements has new content, a new theme, and a new subtitle : A Use Case Approach . In this edition, the use case technique is the cornerstone technique, and a more prescriptive approach has been chosen and represented. For example, Chapter 14, A Use Case Primer, has been added to provide a more fundamental basis for understanding and applying use cases. It should serve as a tutorial adequate for an otherwise uninitiated individual to be able to learn and begin to apply the technique. The HOLIS case study has also been updated to reflect a more use-case-centered approach. Chapter 26, From Use Case to Test Case, has been added to illustrate how the use cases can directly drive a comprehensive test strategy as well as serve as direct input to the test cases themselves .

In addition, we've made one substantial enhancement motivated solely by our own purposes. Chapter 17 (which appeared in the first edition as Chapter 18, The Champion), has been renamed Product Management and enhanced with new material designed to help teams understand how to turn a software application into what we call the whole product solution . Since getting the requirements "right" cannot by itself ensure commercial success, this chapter provides insight and guidelines for those activities (such as pricing and licensing, positioning and messaging) and other commercial factors that transform a working software application into a software product people want to buy .

Also, since modern software development processes are becoming more iterative, we decided to repurpose the first edition's chapter on quality so that this edition's chapter would provide a more comprehensive look at quality within the context of a modern software process. Thus Chapter 29, Assessing Requirements Quality in Iterative Development, speaks directly to iterative techniques for gathering and improving requirements within an overall iterative development framework.

Finally, we also took the opportunity to address a new undercurrent in the industry, a movement toward what are perceived as lighter, less formal methods . In the extreme, Extreme Programming (XP), as espoused by Beck and others, could be interpreted to eliminate process entirely. Perhaps more correctly, XP incorporates certain keystone processes, such as direct customer requirements input, directly into programming practices, but it's also fair to note that the concepts of "software process" and the "M" word (methodology) are studiously avoided. Perhaps less extreme and considered by some to be more practical, the introduction of Agile Methods , as advocated by Cockburn and others, has also taken root. Though controversial in some circles, these lighter approaches cannot be ignored, and we've addressed these in the requirements context in another new chapter, Chapter 30, Agile Requirements Methods.

Of course, no book can be all things to all people. In order to make this edition as readable as possible, we eliminated a number of topics and chapters from the prior version and shortened others.

We sincerely hope that you will find this revised text more approachable, as well as easier to use and apply, and that it will better help you and your teams to manage your software requirements.