| < Day Day Up > |
Why do so many vertical industries make significant investments in wireless networking? Many experts try to make the reason for going wireless too simple by citing hardware cost savings—even the venerable research firm, Gartner, touts the total cost of ownership for wireless connections. Gartner says that a WLAN costs run a little more than $3000 per port, versus $5000 for wired links, with most of the savings coming from doing away with the need to pull cable through walls. But that's just part of the reason for the growing interest in Wi-Fi.
The burgeoning interest in all things wireless is fed by a new generation of devices and applications, which are changing technology strategies and increasing mobility opportunities. Executives are beginning to understand the efficiencies that wireless networking can bring about—resulting in impressive total cost of ownership and return on investment figures.
The trick is to not let the costs or the challenges that wireless networking
| < Day Day Up > |
| < Day Day Up > |
| < Day Day Up > |
| < Day Day Up > |
A typical enterprise network topology has multiple local area networks (LANs) connected by bridges or Layer 2 switches. Many times the different LANs are all of one type, typically wired Ethernet, but that is changing. Wireless networks are entering these hallowed grounds. Furthermore, today's networks are converging into a unique network infrastructure that is expected to carry data in the form of voice, video, and mission critical applications. These applications require a certain amount of bandwidth in order to provide the end-
With the help of "Quality of Service" or "QoS" technologies, networks (and network managers) can give priority to certain data, users, and/or applications. This is typically accomplished via bandwidth management techniques that allow specific types of application to have specified bandwidth and delivery requirements satisfied. In a non-QoS-enabled network all data packets
When QoS mechanisms are in place, an overburdened WLAN can be optimized so it can sufficiently service mission-critical applications, and queue less important data for transmission as network conditions allow. QoS allows an
QoS techniques
Enhanced queuing tools can differentiate incoming traffic in multiple queues to prioritize interactive applications (e.g. video packets) to provide the end-user with a quality video stream.
QoS tools can manage and even avoid congestion by
QoS mechanisms can shape and police data traffic in order to provide a specific level of service between the data source and its end-users.
Bandwidth reservation techniques that cross the network can provide a
Historically, much of the data that networks move around has related to business applications where strict QoS measures are unnecessary, since these applications aren't materially affected by packet arrival latencies. But now, whether the network landscape consists solely of wired LANs, is wireless, or a mix of both, networks deliver a variety of applications, some of which are quite sensitive to QoS. So while delivering text and other relatively simple types of data around a network (wired or wireless) doesn't
Note, however, that when considering Quality of Service in a networking environment, you also must allow for the human element. That is because, at a fundamental level, QoS services are based on human perceptual considerations.
| < Day Day Up > |