References

Bendell, A., D. Solomon, and J. M. Carter. 1995. Evaluating Project Completion Times When Activity Times Are Erlang Distributed. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46: 867–882.

Burt, J. M., and M. B. Garman. 1971a. Monte Carlo Techniques for Stochastic PERT Network Analysis. INFOR 9: 248–262.

Burt, J. M., and M. B. Garman. 1971b. Conditional Monte Carlo: A Simulation Technique for Stochastic Network Analysis. Management Science 19: 207–217.

Chapman, C., and S. Ward. 1997. Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques, and Insights. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Davis, C. S., and M. Stephens. 1983. Approximate Percentage Points Using Pearson Curves. Algorithm AS1. Applied Statistics 32: 322–327.

Eichhorn, B. 1997. Manage Contingencies, Reduce Risk: The PCA Technique. PM Network (October): 47–49.

Goldratt, E. 1997. Critical Chain. Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.

Gong, D. 1997. Optimization of Float Use in Risk Analysis-Based Network Scheduling. International Journal of Project Management 15: 187–192.

Gong, D., and R. Hugsted. 1993. Time-Uncertainty Analysis in Project Networks with a New Merge-Event Time-Estimation Technique. International Journal of Project Management 11 (August): 165–173.

Gong, D., and J. E. Rowlings. 1997. Calculation of Safe Float Use in Risk-Analysis-Oriented Network Scheduling. International Journal of Project Management 13: 187–194.

Gray, C. F., and R. E. Reiman. 1969. PERT Simulation: A Dynamic Approach to the PERT Technique. Journal of Systems Management (March): 18–23.

Grey, Stephen. 1995. Practical Risk Assessment for Project Management. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Gump, A. 1997. Scheduling High-Tech Projects. PM Network (July): 15–17.

Huchzermeier, A., and C. H. Loch. 2001. Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R&D. Management Science 47: 85–101.

Hulett, David T. 1995. Project Schedule Risk Assessment. Project Management Journal (March): 21–31.

Hulett, David T. 1996. Schedule Risk Analysis Simplified. PM Network (July): 23–30.

Hulett, David T. 2000. Project Schedule Risk Analysis: Monte Carlo Simulation or PERT? PM Network (February): 43–47.

Johnson, G. A., and C. D. Schou. 1990. Expediting Projects in PERT with Stochastic Time Estimates. Project Management Journal 2 (June): 29–33.

Jones, E. F. 2000. Risk Management—Why? PM Network 14 (February): 39–42.

Kangari, R., and L. T. Boyer. 1989. Risk Management by Expert Systems. Project Management Journal (March): 40–48.

Levine, H. A. 1996. Risk Management for Dummies, Part 2. PM Network (April): 11–14.

Ringer, L. J. 1969. Numerical Operators for Statistical PERT Path Analysis. Management Science 16: B136–B143.

Ruskin, A. M. 2000. Using Unders to Offset Overs. PM Network 14 (February): 31–37.

Sculli, D. 1983. The Completion Time of PERT Networks. Journal of the Operational Research Society 34: 155–158.

Simister, S. J. 1994. Usage and Benefits of Project Risk Analysis and Management. International Journal of Project Management 12: 5–8.

Van Slyke, R. M. 1963. Monte Carlo Methods, The PERT Problem. Operations Research 11: 839–860.