Risk Response Planning
Risk Response Planning provides options for reducing threats to project objectives and enhancing opportunities. In this process, the responsibilities for implementing these responses must be assigned and incorporated into the project
budgets
(cost and time).
The inputs are:
-
Risk Management Plan
Roles, responsibilities, definitions, budgets, and risk thresholds
-
Risk Register
Including risk priority, the near-
term
risks, those that need more analysis, watch list, and trends
Risk Response Planning Inputs
Without the discipline of previous risk management processes, project
teams
may be tempted to rush into developing responses for risks that are identified but not evaluated and
analyzed
. Risk responses utilize resources, so these responses should deliver value to the project. Minus an understanding of the causes and impact of each risk, the selected risk responses may not be adequate or may be unnecessary. If Risk Identification is not performed well, some risk events may be missed. When resources are
scarce
and potential risks are
numerous
, Quantitative Risk Analysis will ensure that project resources are directed to the most effective risk responses.
Each identified risk that is significant enough to affect project objectives will need at least one risk response. There are several categories of responses. Some are intended to prevent risks, some are intended to protect the project objectives from risk, and some are reactive. These categories are sorted by negative risks or threats, positive risks or opportunities, and both threats and opportunities. The choice of response may also be influenced by other factors, such as the organization's culture, regulations, and industry standards, for example.
Options for dealing with negative risks or threats include:
-
Avoid
There are many ways to avoid risks:
-
Change the project plan to eliminate the risk
-
Change the project plan to protect the project objectives from its impact
-
Relax the project objective(s) that are at risk
-
Change the project plan (scope) by clarifying requirements
-
Improve performance through better communication and acquiring expertise and information
-
Transfer
Shift the consequence of a risk and ownership of the response to a third party. Insurance policies and outsourcing are examples of transference. This option is commonly used if the risk is too great or if outside experts are needed to manage the risk.
-
Mitigate
Reduce the probability and/or consequences of an adverse risk event to an acceptable threshold. Some of the activities for mitigation may end up on the project schedule and as such can cause a change to the original project schedule and project budget. This is one reason why it is a good idea to start the risk management processes early.
Options for dealing with positive risks or threats include:
-
Exploit
Directly exploit risks with positive impacts to take advantage of an opportunity for improved project performance.
-
Share
Allocate ownership of the risk to a third party more capable of capturing the positive risk or opportunity. Incentives are built into the partnership to
encourage
this.
-
Enhance
Identify and maximize key drivers for opportunities, thereby strengthening the impact or increasing the probability of the positive risk event.
Strategies for both threats and opportunities include:
-
Accept
Do nothing; used when there is no possibility of
elimination
or when the costs are prohibitive.
-
Contingency
Do nothing until certain predetermined conditions (risk triggers) are met. Contingency plans are created in advance and activated when these conditions are met.
|
Q.
|
Name
the strategies for negative risks
.
|
|
|
|
A.
|
Avoid, Mitigate, Transfer, Contingency, Accept
|
|
|
|
B.
|
Avoid, Transfer, Mitigate
|
|
|
|
C.
|
Avoid, Transfer, Accept, Mitigate
|
|
|
|
D.
|
None of the above
|
The best answer is A. Contingency and Accept are for both positive and negative risk events and should be
considered
in addition to the negative risk responses.
Table 15-4. Examples of Risk Response Strategies
|
Strategy
|
Type of Risk
|
Example
|
|
Avoid
|
Negative, Threat
|
Revise the schedule so that if the risk occurs, the project completion date is not missed
|
|
Transfer
|
Negative, Threat
|
Insurance policy
|
|
Mitigate
|
Negative, Threat
|
In-process inspection or review
|
|
Exploit
|
Positive, Opportunity
|
Shorten the project duration by increasing resources or level of talent
|
|
Share
|
Positive, Opportunity
|
Joint venture
|
|
Enhance
|
Positive, Opportunity
|
Increase probability of a positive risk event
|
|
Accept
|
Positive or Negative
|
Add enough time or money into contingency reserve to handle the risk if it occurs
|
|
Contingency
|
Positive or Negative
|
Additional oversight of a vendor if certain schedule or quality objectives are missed
|
Risk Response Planning Outputs
Again, the updated Risk Register and the updated Risk Management Plan are the primary outputs for this Risk Management Process. The level of detail in the register should be appropriate for the risk priority and the risk responses that have been approved and selected.
The
components
of the Risk Register are:
-
Identified risks
-
Risk
owners
-
Outputs from Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses
-
Approved response strategies
-
Budget and schedule activities
-
Contingency
reserves
-
Contingency plans and triggers
-
Secondary risks
-
Project Management Plan updates
-
Risk response activities
-
Risk Related Contractual Agreement
|
Q.
|
True or False? Mitigation as a response strategy will always add time and/or money to the project
.
|
{% if main.adsdop %}{% include 'adsenceinline.tpl' %}{% endif %}
The correct answer is false. Adding items to the project plan may not change the project costs or scheduled completion date if the mitigation activity is a modification of something that is already planned, such as contacting the vendor in the example in Table 15-5 to check on the status of the order by phone on a weekly or daily basis and asking for verification of progress.
Table 15-5. Updated Risk RegisterRisk Responses
|
Risk Event Description
|
Priority (High, Medium, Low)
|
Risk Owner
|
Category of Risk
|
Approved Response Strategy
|
Contingency Reserve
|
Contingency Plan and Triggers
|
Secondary Risks
|
|
Equipment vendor delivers late
|
High
|
Mary
|
ExternalSuppliers
|
Contingency
|
3 weeks to the schedule $3000 for additional effort, travel, and expedited shipping
|
Additional meetings (at vendor's site) with vendor if intermediate milestones are missed and expedited shipping
|
Taking an active part in managing the vendor may decrease vendor's ownership of meeting the delivery date
|
|