|
|
|
One test of a corporate strategy is to see how well it
It goes back to the structural cost advantage, which is very much at the root of our business model in terms of having a more efficient distribution. Eliminating dealers, middlemen, inventories; the Internet; all the efficiencies that we have been working so hard to drive have kind of kicked in the afterburners in the last 12 months.
Additional evidence that this was a successful strategy is not hard to find. During the technology bust of 2001, for example, Dell cut the prices of its computers. This prompted at least one competitor to criticize Dell for allegedly igniting a price war, which this competitor described as a "dumb" move. Michael Dell shrugged off the salvo, responding, "If you don't have the real ability to differentiate, a price war is dumb." According to Dell, that was exactly the position his competitor was in—and it was no surprise, he added, that his rival was in the process of making a "very substantial exit" from that market.
Nor did Michael Dell express much concern about "the most rapid market consolidation ever" in his relatively young industry. Rather than
Essentially we have now taken on the number one share position on a worldwide basis. We have seen about a seven-point swing in market share in the United States on a year-by-year basis. So officially [rapid market consolidation] has accelerated in about four quarters what it normally has taken us about nine or ten
quarters to do, in terms of a shift in market share.
When consumers—companies and individuals alike—begin
The real takeaway from this episode is probably self-evident. The pieces of the puzzle have to fit together in a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously, the direct model is an unusual approach to distribution that wouldn't meet the needs of most businesses. Still, other organizations can
First, if you just step back from whether it's direct or indirect and you just look at the way business works ... it's based on the assumption that you don't really know when and how the demand is going to occur.
Although gauging customer demand became somewhat easier for some companies once Internet technology transformed assumptions and business models, it continues to be a difficult undertaking for most companies. Again, the evidence abounds: If forecasting demand were easy, the business news would include far fewer stories of excess inventory and multibillion-dollar write-offs. [1]
Nimbleness is a critical ingredient. Dell says it is imperative that companies "be prepared for all possible ... instances of demand whenever and wherever they may occur." Of course, that's relatively easy for a company like Dell, with its "made to order"
He admits that the Internet was tailor-made for his company, allowing the firm to gauge demand more accurately than ever before. In early 2002, Dell was raking in between $60 and $70 million of sales over the Internet on a
daily
basis, and Dell is hoping to boost this number substantially within a couple of
There are goals to have 100 percent of our sales on line ... that's the only correct goal for us as far as we're
concerned ...so we keep driving in that direction .... Evolutionfollows a couple of different paths. One is machine-to-machine communication.
Another part of the formula is
automation
, especially in the order process. The goal is to get machines talking to machines. A machine at a client company places an order with a machine at Dell. That triggers the entire made-to-order process, which then becomes more or less automatic. "Over 90 percent of our supply-chain transactions are machine-to-machine transactions," Dell says with obvious satisfaction. Of course, "you have to put some
Based on Michael Dell's experience, there are several things that any organization should keep in mind in order to maximize sales opportunities and keep costs down:
FIND BETTER WAYS TO GAUGE DEMAND.
The basis of the Dell model is an incredibly firm grasp on demand. Other companies, regardless of their
MOVE AS MUCH BUSINESS AS POSSIBLE ONTO THE INTERNET, AND INCREASE THE PERCENTAGE OF "MACHINE-TO-MACHINE" BUSINESS.
Dell may never reach his goal of garnering 100 percent of his sales online. But remember that 90 percent of his supply-chain transactions are machine-to-machine. This may be
[1] The great NASDAQ meltdown of 2000–2002 occurred in part because companies built up excessive inventories on the assumption that the voracious demand for technology of the late 1990s would continue into the new century. When demand failed to materialize, companies missed earnings and sales targets by wide margins, and hundreds of billions of dollars disappeared from the stock market as the vast majority of technology stocks plummeted. Dell was not immune; its market capitalization also dropped. In essence, the market reevaluated the true worth of all technology stocks. This took the air out of the NASDAQ bubble, which was caused, in large part, by the exaggerated valuation of Internet stocks.
|
|
|