The legacy of publicly regulated institutional advances and a tightly controlled economy has been difficult for India to shrug off. Despite government initiatives to clear up regulatory impediments, India's bureaucratic business and "risk-averse financial systems" combine to create strong institutional barriers for funding innovation. Creative funding resources are also hindered by the corrupt reputation of the bureaucracy. Despite the committed reform and deregulation attempts of the Indian government, excessive regulations still continue to frustrate the development of VC in India. Corporate laws remain inflexible in terms of risk sharing, control, and exit arrangements between financers and private firm management. And "even in 2001 the Indian rupee was non- convertible ," hampering VC inflows from offshore and requiring approvals from multiple agencies. [15] Three separate bodies continue to standardize the industry with their own regulations: SEBI, the Ministry of Finance, and the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) regulate domestic VC funds, while foreign firms have two additional regulatory controls: the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). [16] Jyoti Gupta, who is currently a professor of finance at the ESCP-EAP European Business School of Management in Paris, discusses India's historical problems of corruption and the potential for wealth creation through Indian networking.
With two important elements in place ” NRIs equipped with international expertise on VC operations and talented Indians beginning to venture into the fields of entrepreneurship and innovation ” the special art of Indian networking has become a critical leveraging point for the development of India's VC industry. In a field where knowing the right people at the right time makes all the difference in terms of appropriate funding and support, the vast Indian network of entrepreneurs are a breeding ground for natural links between ideas and finance. |