4.1. Visualizing Information Architecture
Why is it important to be able to visualize information architecture? There are several answers. One is that the field is new, and many people don't believe that things exist until they can see them. Another is that the field is abstract, and many who might conceptually understand the basic
of information architecture won't really "get it" until they see it and experience it. Finally, a well-designed information architecture is invisible to users (which, paradoxically, is quite an unfair reward for IA success).
IA's lack of
qualities forces all information
to be salespeople to some degree. Because it's highly probable that you'll need to explain information architecture to several important people, including colleagues, managers, prospects,
, and perhaps your significant other, it's in your interest to be able to help them visualize what an information architecture actually is.
Let's start by looking at a site's main page. Figure 4-1 shows the main page for Gustavus Adolphus College in Saint Peter, Minnesota, USA.
Figure 4-1. Gustavus Adolphus College's main page
What's obvious here? Most immediately, you see that the site's visual design stands out. You can't help but notice the site's colors (you'll have to take our word for it), typeface choices, and images. You also notice aspects of the site's information design; for example, the number of columnsand their widthschanges throughout the page.
What else? With a careful eye, you can detect aspects of the site's interaction design, such as the use of mouseovers (over main menu choices) and pull-down
for "Go Quickly To" and search options. Although the college's logo and logotype are prominent, the site relies on textual content (e.g., "Excellence," "Community," and so forth) to
its message and brand. And although this particular site functions well, you'd learn something about its supporting technology (and
expertise) just from the main pagefor example, if it didn't load properly in a common browser, you might guess that the designers weren't aware of or
with standards-compliant design.
Thus far, we've noticed all sorts of things that aren't information architecture. So what
recognizable as information architecture? You might be surprised by how much information architecture you can see if you know how to look. For example, the information has been structured in some basic ways, which we'll explain in later chapters:
Present the site's information to us in a variety of ways, such as content categories that pertain to the entire campus (e.g., the top bar and its "Calendar" and "Academics" choices), or to specific audiences (the "I am a..." area, with such choices as "Prospective Students" and "Staff Member").
Help users move through the content, such as the "AZ Directory" and the "Go Quickly To..." menu of popular destinations.
Allow users to search the content. Here, the default is set to search the Gustavus site, but one could also search the Gustavus calendar, its directory, or the whole web from the site's search interface.
Describe categories, options, and links in language that (hopefully) is meaningful to users; you'll see examples throughout the page, some (e.g., "Admission") more understandable than others ("Nobel Conference").
Figure 4-2 provides a visualization of these architectural
Figure 4-2. This page is crammed with architectural components
As we can see from this figure and from Figure 4-3, these areas are just the tip of the iceberg. Categories
pages and applications throughout the site; labels systematically represent the site's content; navigation systems and a search system can be used to move through the site. That's quite a lot of information architecture to cram into one screenshot!
In effect, the Gustavus main page
to anticipate users' major information needs, such as "How do I find out about admissions?" or "What's going on this week on campus?" The site's information architects have worked hard to determine the most common questions, and have designed the site to meet those needs. We refer to this as
top-down information architecture
, and the Gustavus main page addresses many common "top-down" questions that users have when they land on a site, including:
Where am I?
I know what I'm looking for; how do I search for it?
How do I get around this site?
What's important and unique about this organization?
What's available on this site?
What's happening there?
Do they want my opinion about their site?
How can I contact a human?
What's their address?
Figure 4-3. A site's main page is crammed with answers to users' questions
Figure 4-4 shows a slightly different examplepages tagged by one of the authors as relevant to enterprise
experience in del.icio.us, a social
Figure 4-4. Bookmarks tagged as about "enterprise_UX" in del.icio.us, a social bookmarking service.
There is little to see here besides the information architecture and the content itself. In fact, as the content is just a collection of links to bookmarked pages from other web sites, the information architecture is the bulk of the page. It provides context for the content, and
us what we can do while we're here.
The information architecture tells us where we are (in del.icio.us, on a page
by user "louisrosenfeld" that contains bookmarks he tagged as "enterprise_ux").
It helps us move to other, closely related pages (by, for example, scrolling through results ("<< earlier later >>") and to pages we've bookmarked using different tags (under "tags" and "related tags").
It helps us move through the site hierarchically (for example, we can navigate to the del.icio.us main page, or to recent or popular bookmarks) and contextually (for example, by clicking on "saved by 4 other people" or by seeing who else bookmarked pages using the same tag).
It allows us to manipulate the content for better browsing (we can display tags in alphabetical order, as is shown, or as a "tag cloud"; a variety of other configuration choices are displayed in the "options").
It tells us where we can go for basic services, such as logging into our account or getting help ("contact us" and "help").
In many respects, this page from del.icio.us is nothing but information architecture.
Content itself can have information architecture embedded within it. The recipe in Figure 4-5 shows a nutritious drink from the Epicurious site.
Figure 4-5. A recipe for the thirsty from Epicurious.com
Beyond the navigational options at the top of the page, there's not much information architecture here. Or is there?
The recipe itself has a clear, strong structure: a title at the top, a list of
, then preparation directions and serving information. This information is "chunked" so you know what's what, even without
for "ingredients" or "directions." The recipe's native
could also support searching and browsing; for example, users might be able to search on the chunks known as "recipe titles" for "salty dog" and retrieve this one. And these
in a logical manner; after all, you'll want to know the ingredients ("Do I have four ounces of grapefruit
?") before you start mixing the drink. The definition and sequential placement of chunks help you to recognize that this content is a recipe before you even read it. And once you know what it is, you have a better idea what this content is about and how to use it, move around it, and go somewhere else from it.
So, if you look closely enough, you can see information architecture even when it's embedded in the guts of your content. In fact, by supporting searching and browsing, the structure inherent in content enables the answers to users' questions to "rise" to the surface. This is
bottom-up information architecture
; content structure, sequencing, and tagging help you answer such questions as:
Bottom-up information architecture is important because users are increasingly likely to bypass your site's top-down information architecture. Instead, they're using web-wide search tools like Google, clicking through ads, and clicking links while reading your content via their aggregators to find
deep in your site. Once there, they'll want to jump to other relevant content in your site without learning how to use its top-down structure. A good information architecture is designed to anticipate this type of use; Keith Instone's simple and practical Navigation Stress Test is a great way to evaluate a site's bottom-up information architecture (http://user-experience.org/uefiles/navstress/).
You now know that information architecture is something that can be seen, if you know what to look for. But it's important to understand that information architecture is often invisible. For example, Figure 4-6 shows some search results from the BBC's web site.
Figure 4-6. BBC's search results include three "Best Links"
What's going on here? We've searched for "chechnya," and the site has presented us with a couple of different things, most interestingly three results labeled as a "BBC Best Link." As you'd imagine, all search results were retrieved by a piece of softwarea search enginethat the user never sees. The search engine has been configured to index and search certain
of the site, to display certain kinds of information in each search result (i.e., page title, extract, and date), and to handle search queries in certain ways, such as removing "stop words" (e.g., "a," "the," and "of"). All of these decisions regarding search system configuration are unknown to users, and are integral aspects of information architecture design.
What's different is that the "Best Link" results are manually created: some people at the BBC decided that "chechnya" is an important term and that some of the BBC's best content is not news stories, which normally come up at the top of most retrieval sets. So they applied some editorial expertise to identify three highly relevant pages and associated them with the
"chechnya," thereby ensuring that these three items are displayed when someone searches for "chechnya." Users might assume these search results are automatically generated, but
are manually modifying the information architecture in the background; this is another example of invisible information architecture.
Information architecture is much more than just blueprints that portray navigational routes and wireframes that
visual design. Our field involves more than meets the eye, and both its visible and invisible aspects help define what we do and
how challenging it really is.