‚ < ‚ Day Day Up ‚ > ‚ | ‚ |
[SYMBOL] [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] [G] [H] [I] [J] [K] [L] [M] [N] [O] [P] [Q] [R] [S] [T] [U] [V] [W] [X] [Y] [Z] Fahncke, Marty (FawnKey & Associates) ‚ fall-through results ‚ FAQ pages ‚ 2nd ‚ Federal Express (FedEx) ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ trademark of, as used in sponsored listings by other companies ‚ 2nd ‚ Federal Trade Commission ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ as requiring paid placement listings to be labeled as sponsored ‚ 2nd ‚ finding ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ if your site is in a directory ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ information ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ rules of web design ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ 5th ‚ 6th ‚ FindWhat.com ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ 5th ‚ 6th ‚ 7th ‚ 8th ‚ 9th ‚ 10th ‚ 11th ‚ 12th ‚ 13th ‚ 14th ‚ 15th ‚ 16th ‚ 17th ‚ 18th ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ as named in trademark infringement lawsuit ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ as Pay-Per-Placement (PPP) search engine ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ testing advertising campaigns on ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ free conversion tracking, as offered by ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ merger with Espotting, as under negotiation ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ search results for "pet meds" ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ 5th ‚ 6th ‚ Fixed Placement programs ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ advantages of ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ better ad placement ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ locked-in rates ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ 5th ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ locking competitors out ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ negotiable deals. ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)]2nd ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)]3rd ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)]4th ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)]5th ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)]6th ‚ [See also negotiable deals (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ and Pay-Per-Placement programs, compared ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ad listing modifications, as more difficult ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ as much more expensive ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ keyword text link rates ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ banner ads, as used with ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ challenges of ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ad listing modifications, as problematic ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ contract lengths ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ cost minimum ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ keyword replacement restrictions ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ commissions to agencies from search engines ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ gross rates and net rates ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ contracts and fees. ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]3rd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]4th ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]5th ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ commissions to agencies from search engines ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ contacting media representative ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ contract lengths, as problematic ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ cost minimum, as prohibitive ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ delivery terms, checking ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)]2nd ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ renewing contracts ‚ [See also keyword rates (below)] ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ invoice reconciliation hassles ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ keyword exclusivity ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ keyword rates ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ cost-per-acquisition (CPA) ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ cost-per-click (CPC) ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ cost-per-thousand (CPM) ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ keyword text links, as moving to Pay-Per-Placement model ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ MSN Search Featured Sites, as example of ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ negotiable deals ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ bonus ads ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ frequency discounts ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ reduced rates ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ questionnaire, for evaluation of ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ Flash (multimedia software) ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ use of, as impediment to search engines ‚ 2nd ‚ 3rd ‚ 4th ‚ 5th ‚ 6th ‚ fonts ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ legibility ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ rules of web design ‚ forms ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ use of, as impediment to search engines ‚ 2nd ‚ frames ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ navigability of web sites using, as important ‚ 2nd ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ use of, as impediment to search engines ‚ 2nd ‚ Froogle (Google comparison shopping engine) ‚ 2nd ‚ |
‚ < ‚ Day Day Up ‚ > ‚ | ‚ |