COMPANIES INCLUDED

data mining: opportunities and challenges
Chapter XIV - Financial Benchmarking Using Self-Organizing Maps Studying the International Pulp and Paper Industry
Data Mining: Opportunities and Challenges
by John Wang (ed) 
Idea Group Publishing 2003
Brought to you by Team-Fly

Each year, in its September issue, Pulp and Paper International ranks the top 150 pulp and paper-producing companies in the world, according to net sales. The list for 1998 (Matussek, Janssens, Kenny, & Riannon, 1999) was used as the basis when choosing the companies in Eklund et al. (2001). Since then, an updated list has been reviewed (Rhiannon, Jewitt, Galasso, & Fortemps, 2001), and the changes were incorporated in the experiment. This experiment was limited to using data available through the companies' annual reports for the years 1995 2000. The primary source for these annual reports was the individual companies' homepages on the Internet, but any physical reports available were also used.

The principle problem in the choice of companies was getting annual reports for all five years. As it turns out, many companies did not provide enough information on their homepages, and we were forced to leave out many companies that were highly ranked on the Top 150 list. This problem was most common among European (excluding Scandinavian companies) and Asian countries, although some U.S. and Canadian companies also caused difficulties. However, through large online databases, we were able to obtain adequate financial information for most U.S., Canadian, and Japanese companies. Generally, the companies that provided the most financial information on their pages were Finnish or Swedish. The final selection of companies is illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1: The included companies

Finland

1

Average

 

2

Ahlstr m

1995 00

3

M-Real Oy

1995 00

4

Stora Enso OY

1995 00

5

UPM-Kymmene OY

1995 00

Sweden

6

Average

 

7

AssiDom n

1995 00

8

Korsn s

1995 00

9

MoDo AB

1995 00

10

Munksj AB

1995 00

11

Rottneros AB

1995 00

12

SCA AB

1995 00

13

S dra AB

1995 00

Norway

14

Average

 

15

Norske Skog A.S.

1995 00

16

Peterson Group

1995 00

USA

17

Average

 

18

Boise Cascade

1995 00

19

Bowater

1995 00

20

Buckeye Techologies

1995 00

21

Caraustar Industries

1995 00

22

Champion International

1995 99

23

Consolidated Papers

1995 99

24

Crown Vantage

1995 99

25

Fort James

1995 99

26

Gaylord Container Corp

1995 00

27

Georgia-Pacific Corp

1995 00

28

International Paper

1995 00

29

Jefferson-Smurfit Corp.

1995 00

30

Kimberly-Clark

1995 00

31

Longview Fiber Corp.

1995 00

32

Mead

1995 00

33

P.H. Glatfelter

1995 00

34

Pope & Talbot

1995 00

35

Potlatch Corp.

1995 00

36

Rayonier

1995 00

37

Riverwood Holding

1995 00

38

Rock-Tenn Company

1995 00

39

Schweitzer-Mauduit Intl.

1995 00

40

Sonoco Products

1995 00

41

Stone Container

1995 97

42

Temple-Inland

1995 00

43

Union Camp.

1995 98

44

Wausau-Mosinee Paper

1995 00

45

Westvaco

1995 00

46

Weyerhaeuser

1995 00

47

Willamette Industries

1995 00

Canada

48

Average

 

49

Abitibi Consolidated

1995 00

50

Alliance

1995 00

51

Canfor

1995 00

52

Cascades Inc.

1995 00

53

Crestbrook Forest Ind.Ltd.

1995 97

54

Doman Industries

1995 00

55

Domtar Inc.

1995 00

56

Donohue

1995 99

57

MacMillan Bloedel

1995 98

58

Nexfor

1995 00

59

Tembec Inc.

1995 00

60

West Fraser Timber

1995 00

Japan

61

Average

 

62

Daio Paper

1995 99

63

Daishowa Paper Manuf

1995 99

64

Chuetsu Paper

1995 99

65

Hokuetsu Paper Mills

1995 99

66

Japan Paperboard Industr

1995 99

67

Mitsubishi Paper

1995 99

68

Nippon Kakoh Seishi

1995 99

69

Nippon Paper Industries

1995 00

70

Oji Paper

1995 00

71

Pilot (Lintec)

1995 00

72

Rengo

1995 99

73

Settsu

1995 98

74

Tokai Pulp & Paper

1995 99

Europe

75

Average

 

76

ENCE Group (Spain)

1995 00

77

Frantschach (AUT)

1995 99

78

Industrieholding Cham (SUI)

1995 00

79

Inveresk (UK)

1995 00

80

Mayr-Melnhof (AUT)

1995 00

81

Reno de Medici (ITA)

1995 00

84

Cartiere Burgo (ITA)

1995 00

Australia & New Zealand

82

Amcor (AUS)

1995 00

83

Fletcher Challenge Group (NZE)

1995 99

Some companies could not be included for other reasons. For example, on the list for 2000, Proctor & Gamble (P&G) was listed as the third largest producer in the world. However, as only 30% of P&G's turnover comes from pulp and paper, we decided not to include it. Also, number six on the list, Nippon Unipac holding, was formed by the merger of Nippon Paper Industries and Daishowa Paper in March 2001, and was, therefore, still included as two separate companies. Also, two companies (Stora Enso and UPM-Kymmene), were included as single companies, even though they emerged through the mergers of companies during the course of the experiment. However, using consolidated reports published by the companies after the merger, we included them as single companies, in order to simplify analysis.

Brought to you by Team-Fly


Data Mining(c) Opportunities and Challenges
Data Mining: Opportunities and Challenges
ISBN: 1591400511
EAN: 2147483647
Year: 2003
Pages: 194
Authors: John Wang

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net