2.5 Summary


2.5 Summary

In his book The Fifth Discipline, Senge [33] wrote, "Business and other human endeavors are bound by invisible fabrics of interrelated actions, which often take years to fully play out their effects on each other. Since we are part of that lacework ourselves, it's doubly hard to see the whole pattern of change. Instead, we tend to focus on snapshots of isolated parts of the system, and wonder why our deepest problems never seem to get solved." What practitioners commonly call the real world is a mere reflection of this phenomenon. The real world is not the result of natural forces and immutable principles at play; it reflects to a great extent the consequence of past decisions taken without a complete understanding of their ramifications.

A systematic understanding of the limitations of human performance and organizational capabilities is a precondition for meeting the challenges arising from the multiproject environment.



References

  1. Cooper, Kenneth G., "The Rework Cycle: Benchmarks for the Project Manager," Project Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1993.

  2. Abdel-Hamid, T., and S. E. Madnick, Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1991.

  3. Sterman, John D., Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000.

  4. Browning, T., Proc. 8th Annual Int. Symp. of INCOSE, Vancouver, British Columbia, July 26–30, 1998.

  5. Steiner, I. D., Group Process and Productivity, New York: Academic Press, 1972.

  6. Repenning, N., P. Gonçalves, and L. Black, Past the Tipping Point: The Persistence of Firefighting in Product Development, Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.

  7. Gilliland, S., and R. Landis, "Quality and Quantity Goals in a Complex Decision Task: Strategies and Outcomes," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 5, 1992, pp. 672–681.

  8. Weinberg, G., and E. Schulman, "Goals and Performance in Computer Programming," Human Factors, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1974, pp. 70–77.

  9. "Process Maturity Profile of the Software Community," Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, midyear update, 2001.

  10. Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board, Report on Project Management in NASA, NASA, 2000.

  11. Jones, C., "Software Defect-Removal Efficiency," IEEE Computer, April 1996.

  12. Kim, J., D. Wilemon, and B. Schultz, "Managing Stress in Product Development Projects," 9th Int. Conf. on Management of Technology, IAMOT 2000.

  13. "Minds at Work: How Much Brainpower Are We Really Using?" Kepner-Tregoe on-line publication, 1997.

  14. "Decision Making in the Digital Age: Challenges and Responses in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, Australia, and the United States," Kepner-Tregoe on-line publication, 2001.

  15. Terwiesch, C., et al., "Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies," Wharton School, 2001.

  16. Nevison, J., "Overtime Hours: The Rule of Fifty," Oak Associates, 1992.

  17. Wiegmann, D., "A Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)," Federal Aviation Administration, 2001.

  18. Hockey, G., "Changes in Operator Efficiency as a Function of Environmental Stress, Fatigue and Circadian Rhythms," in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (eds.), Vol. 2, Cognitive Processes and Performance, New York: Wiley, 1986.

  19. Blanchard, B., "Design and Manage to Life Cycle Cost," Weber Systems, 1978.

  20. Clark, K. B., and S. C. Wheelwright, Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases, New York: Free Press, 1993.

  21. PRTM, "Measurement and Management: A Prelude to Action," Insight, Vol. 7, No. 2.

  22. Rubinstein, J., D. Meyer, and J. Evans, "Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, August 2001.

  23. Spitzer, H. F., "Studies in Retention," Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 30, 1939, pp. 641–656.

  24. Baddeley, A., Human Memory: Theory and Practice, rev. ed., Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.

  25. Goldratt, E., Critical Chain, Croton-on-Hudson, NY: North River Press, 1997.

  26. Perry, D., et al., "People, Organizations and Process Improvement," IEEE Software, July 1994.

  27. Jagodzinski, P., et al., "A Study of Electronics Engineering Design Teams," Journal of Design Studies, Vol. 21, 2000, 375–402.

  28. Brooks, F. P., The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

  29. Nevinson, J., "What Can We Learn About Learning in Projects?"PMNet, June 1994.

  30. Allen, T., Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.

  31. Bruegge, B., and A. H. Dutoit, Software Metrics for Distributed Development, CMU-CS-96-190, 1996.

  32. The Standish Group, "The Chaos Report," 1994, http://www.pm2go.com/sample_research.

  33. Senge, P. M., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday, 1990.