12. Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition


Print   Close Window
Note: Large images and tables on this page may necessitate printing in landscape mode.

Copyright 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies.  All rights reserved.

Clinician's Pocket Reference > Chapter 12. Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition >

Definitions

Nutritional support is the provision of nutrients with therapeutic intent by either the enteral or the parenteral route. Technically, the term enteral nutrition includes oral supplements as well as tube feeding, but in practice, clinicians use the term to refer strictly to tube feeding. Enteral and parenteral nutrition are important in the management of many medical conditions. Safe and effective nutritional therapy depends on careful selection of patients and a thorough understanding of the complications that can occur.

Enteral Nutrition

If the gut works, use it. This simple adage is the guiding principle of nutritional support. Clinical practice guidelines consistently endorse the use of enteral nutrition for patients who have a functional GI tract but cannot take enough nutrients orally to maintain adequate nutritional status. Enteral nutrition has the following physiologic and practical benefits that make tube feeding superior to parenteral nutrition:

Advantages of Enteral Nutrition
Maintains normal metabolic pathways
Allows delivery of a full range of nutrients
Triggers the release of cholecystokinin
Preserves hepatic lipid metabolism
Maintains normal intestinal pH and flora
Supports the GI tract as an organ of the immune system
Promotes wound healing
Lowers costs
Reduces infectious complications

Technological advances in enteral access techniques have increased the numbers of patients who can safely receive tube feeding. The indications for enteral nutrition are as follows:

Indications for Enteral Nutrition
Poor Oral Intake (Won't Eat)
Anorexia
Depression
Disabilities
Eating disorders
Early satiety
Nausea
Painful swallowing
Unsafe Oral Intake (Can't Eat)
Altered level of consciousness
Dysphagia
Endotracheal intubation
Gastroparesis
Impaired sucking and swallowing
Proximal intestinal obstruction
Elevated Needs (Can't Eat Enough)
Burns
Open wounds
Pressure ulcers
Sepsis
Trauma

Principles of Enteral Tube Feeding

Timing:

The optimal time for initiating enteral nutrition depends on the patient's baseline nutritional status and clinical condition. Well-nourished patients in stable condition can tolerate suboptimal nutritional intake for 7 14 d without harmful effects. On the other hand, a convincing body of evidence has shown that early enteral feeding improves clinical outcome among critically ill patients. Many ICUs have established protocols calling for initiation of tube feeding within 24 36 h of admission to the unit.

Delivery Site:

The fundamental decision in planning tube feeding is to determine whether nutrients should be delivered to the stomach or the small intestine. The factors involved in choosing the appropriate location for enteral nutrition include gastric function and risk of aspiration. In general, the gastric route is preferred because feeding into the stomach is better tolerated than intestinal feeding and is technically easier. Although high risk of aspiration is the primary reason for intestinal feeding, other conditions, such as delayed gastric emptying, gastric outlet obstruction, and the presence of a tumor, also limit use of the stomach as a site of tube feeding.

In the past, standard practice was to place feeding tubes just beyond the pylorus, into the first or second portion of the duodenum, to guard against reflux and aspiration. However, there is insufficient evidence that postpyloric feeding protects against aspiration. Reflux of enteral formula and migration of the feeding tube into the stomach can occur, negating any potential benefit of postpyloric feeding. Some evidence suggests that aspiration risk can be reduced by selecting more distal locations for enteral access. As a result, current practice guidelines advocate positioning feeding tubes in the third portion of the duodenum or beyond the ligament of Treitz for patients at risk of aspiration.

Enteral Access Devices:

Tubes inserted through the nose or the mouth are most appropriate for short-term use or in situations in which unstable clinical status prevents more invasive placement procedures. In patients with head or facial injuries, insert tubes orally to avoid injury.

The two categories of nasogastric tubes are small-bore and large-bore. Each type has benefits and drawbacks. Small-bore feeding tubes are soft and flexible; a guidewire or stylet provides the rigidity needed for insertion. Large-bore tubes are usually made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), a stiff material that allows placement without a stylet. PVC becomes more rigid during use, and this characteristic increases the risk of otitis media, sinusitis, and nasal irritation. Small-bore tubes improve patient comfort and are less likely to cause ear and sinus problems, but small tubes are prone to clogging and become displaced easily. In the past, small-bore feeding tubes were thought to carry a lower risk of aspiration than large-bore tubes, but more recent results suggest that the presence of a tube of any size across the lower esophageal sphincter increases risk of reflux and aspiration.

A key factor in selecting the type of feeding tube is the ability to measure gastric residual volume (GRV) to evaluate gastric emptying. Small-bore tubes do not always allow measurement of GRV. Thus a larger tube is often used initially and replaced with a small-bore tube once feeding tolerance is established. Types of feeding tubes and placement procedures are discussed in Chapter 13, Procedure (for Nasogastric and Feeding Tubes).

When enteral feeding is expected to last > 30 d, a feeding enterostomy is superior to nasally placed tubes. The most common sites for placement are the stomach and the jejunum, although a feeding enterostomy can be placed in the pharynx or esophagus. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is one of the most widely used feeding enterostomies. Other placement options include radiologic, laparoscopic, and open surgical techniques. Less invasive placement methods are preferred, but not all patients are candidates for these procedures. Morbidly obese patients and those with tumors, GI obstruction, adhesions, or abnormal anatomy may need open surgical placement. Techniques for placing percutaneous jejunostomy tubes have replaced older methods that involved threading a small-bore feeding tube through an existing gastrostomy or using a needle catheter device to achieve access to the jejunum.

Dual-lumen, or combination, feeding tubes are safe and effective conduits for enteral nutrition. With combination tubes, one lumen terminates in the stomach and the second extends into the small intestine, allowing simultaneous gastric decompression and intestinal feeding. These tubes, which are inserted through the nose or through an enterostomy, are especially beneficial for postoperative patients and others with impaired gastric emptying.

Enteral Formulas:

A vast number of enteral formulas are available, and many formulas are quite similar in composition. Most hospitals maintain an enteral formulary that contains representative examples of each formula category. With the exception of infant formulas and blenderized adult formulas, enteral formulas are gluten-free and contain no lactose. Characteristics to consider in selecting an appropriate enteral formula include nutrient composition, caloric density, free water content, osmolality, and the presence of fiber. Table 12 1 lists types of enteral formulas and their composition.

Table 12 1 Enteral Formulas


CategoryDescriptionClinical ConsiderationsExamples (Brand Names)
Standard low residue or fiber enriched: 1.0 1.2 kcal/mL, 270 490 mOsm/LContains intact protein, fat, and carbohydrate; free water ~ 84%For routine tube feeding; not for use in hypermetabolic illness; unflavored products not for oral useEnsure, FiberSource, Isocal, Isosource, Jevity, Nutren 1.0 Osmolite, Ultracal
Concentrated low residue: 1.5 2.0 kcal/mL, 430 525 mOsm/LNutrients similar to standard low residue formulas; contain less free water and more fat; free water ~ 74% Used to restrict fluid, relieve symptoms from high volume feeding, and to meet elevated nutrient needs. Closely monitor of hydration status.Comply, Ensure Plus, Deliver 2.0, TwoCal HN, Isosource 1.5, Nutren 1.5, 2.0
Elemental/semielemental: 1.0 1.5 kcal/mL, 270 650 mOsm/LNutrients in easily digested form; many contain MCT oil or little long-chain fat, no fiberFor patients with impaired digestion and absorption; appropriate for patients with fat intoleranceAlitraq, Criticare, Isotein, Intensical, Peptamin, Subdue, Vital, Vivonex
Renal failure: 2.0 kcal/mL, 600 mOsm/LLow protein with emphasis on essential amino acids; may not provide vitamins or electrolytes; free water ~ 70%Intended to improve nitrogen retention with minimal effect on uremiaRenalcal, Suplena
Renal failure with dialysis: 2.0 kcal/mL, 570 665 mOsm/LProvides moderate protein; vitamin and mineral content modified for renal failure; free water ~70%Provides moderate protein for patients with losses from dialysis; vitamin and electrolyte profile adjusted for altered renal metabolismMagnacal Renal, Nepro
Respiratory failure: 1.5 kcal/mL, 330 650 mOsm/LContains low levels of carbohydrate, high fat; no fiber; free water ~ 78%Developed to reduce CO2 produced by carbohydrate metabolism; some contain omega three fatty acids and antioxidants
 
Novasource Pulmonary, Nutrivent, Pulmocare, Respelor, Oxepa
Wound healing: 1.0 1.5 kcal/mL, 340 560 mOsm/LVery high protein content; some have enhanced vitamin profile; free water ~ 78 83%Designed to support healing of surgical wounds and pressure ulcersIsosource VHN, Promote, Protain XL, Resource, Replete, Traumacal
Immune modulation: 1.0 1.5 kcal/mL, 375 630 mOsm/LDesigned for patients with hypermetabolic illness; usually high in protein; many are enriched with specific nutrients arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acids; some contain fiber Designed for use during hypermetabolic illness; theoretical benefits for immune function. Use with caution in critically ill, septic patients.Alitraq, Crucial, Impact, Immunaid
Diabetes: 1.0 1.06 kcal/mL, 300 380 mOsm/LLow carbohydrate and high ratio of monosaturated fatty acids; contains fiber Used for patients with abnormal glucose tolerance; nutrient profile meets American Diabetes Association guidelines; many can be consumed orallyDiabetisource, Choice DM, Glytrol, Glucerna

The clinical importance of osmolality enteral formulas is debated. At one time, tube feeding was routinely started with half-strength formula to avoid problems related to osmolality. Subsequent research did not show that osmolality contributes significantly to feeding intolerance, especially when rapid infusion rates are avoided.

Feeding intolerance due to osmolality can occur with jejunostomy feeding, but using an enteral pump to control the rate of delivery of formula into the small intestine usually circumvents this problem.

Ordering and Advancing Tube Feedings

Depending on institutional policies and professional licensure laws, responsibility for ordering tube feeding falls to physicians, dietitians, clinical nurse specialists, or pharmacists. As with medication prescriptions, orders for enteral nutrition must specify the name of the enteral formula and the route of delivery. The order must also include the target rate for tube feeding as well as a schedule for advancing the feedings to the goal. Start tube feedings slowly and increase them as the patient's tolerance allows. In hospitalized patients, tube feedings are frequently administered continuously with the aid of an infusion pump. In particular, patients with a jejunal tube usually need a pump control to avoid feeding intolerance. Rapid infusion of enteral formula into the jejunum can produce dumping syndrome, which has symptoms similar to the effects of surgical procedures such as Billroth II gastrectomy. Pump-controlled feedings typically begin at 10 40 mL/h and increase in increments of 10 25 mL/h q4 6h as tolerated. For patients who are eating but are not meeting their needs, an enteral feeding pump can be used to administer nutrients during the night to supplement oral intake.

Under certain circumstances, tube feeding can be administered without a pump. This method, called bolus feeding, is most appropriate for patients with a gastrostomy tube as the sole source of nutrition. With bolus feeding, patients receive 200 400 mL 4 6 times/d. The entire food bolus flows into the stomach through the barrel of a 50- or 60-mL syringe attached to the feeding tube. Bolus feeding is widely used in subacute and home care settings.

Complications of Enteral Nutrition

Aspiration:

Aspiration pneumonia is a common and life-threatening complication of enteral nutrition. The following are risk factors for aspiration:

Risk Factors for Aspiration
  • Advanced age
  • Impaired consciousness
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Impaired gag and cough reflex
  • Endotracheal intubation
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Tracheostomy
  • Gastroesophageal reflux (presence of tube)
  • Delayed gastric emptying, elevated gastric residual volume

Jejunal feeding can reduce but not eliminate aspiration risk. As for other aspiration precautions, the single most effective measure for preventing aspiration is to elevate the head of the bed during feeding. Enteral feeding protocols also call for measuring GRV approximately every 4 5 h until feeding tolerance is established. Although it is a routine part of the management of tube feedings, measurement of GRV has been the focus of considerable debate. Methods vary considerably, and studies have not identified a GRV value that allows accurate prediction of aspiration risk. The most widely used threshold for intervention is 150 200 mL. For patients receiving continuous feeding, a GRV greater than twice the hourly infusion rate raises concern about the adequacy of gastric emptying. Some protocols stipulate that tube feeding be stopped for an hour or more in response to a single elevated GRV measurement. Others call for monitoring the patient closely and stopping feedings only after two consecutive measurements are elevated. Prokinetic agents may improve gastric emptying and allow feeding to proceed safely. The key point is that clinicians must not rely on GRV as the sole indicator of aspiration risk but evaluate the patient in the context of the entire clinical situation.

Diarrhea:

Occurs in 10 60% of patients receiving enteral feedings. Many factors contribute to the incidence of diarrhea among tube-fed patients, including underlying illness, the presence of bacteria, medications, and feeding intolerance. Each of these causes must be systematically ruled out as a cause of the problem. As a starting point, to rule out Clostridium difficile colitis, order a stool culture for patients with diarrhea who have received antibiotics. If this test result is negative, administer antidiarrheal agents to control symptoms. Administering a probiotic such as lactobacillus acidophilus (Lactinex) can help restore normal flora and decrease diarrhea. Medications frequently cause diarrhea in patients receiving tube feeding, especially those with a jejunal tube in place. Electrolytes, particularly magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium, are notorious offenders, as are drugs that contain sorbitol. Changing the enteral formula or adjusting the feeding regimen may provide relief.

Constipation:

Although less common than diarrhea, constipation can occur in patients receiving enteral nutrition, especially those in long-term care facilities. Switching to a fiber-enriched enteral formula may alleviate the problem. Adequate hydration is important in promoting regular bowel movements. Provide additional free water as periodic water boluses or as a separate enteral infusion.

Dehydration:

One of the most common metabolic disorders among tube-fed patients. Numerous factors contribute to the problem, including the use of concentrated, high-protein formulas, poor oral intake of liquids, hyperglycemia, fever, diarrhea, and failure to administer the prescribed volume of formula. Weight loss and elevations in sodium, chloride, and BUN are characteristic of dehydration related to enteral nutrition. Keep in mind that the percentage of free water in enteral formulas ranges from 70% to 84% of the volume administered. On average, patients should receive 30 mL/kg/d of free water. Patients in whom dehydration develops may need a less concentrated enteral formula or additional free water.

Parenteral Nutrition

Indications

In circumstances in which lack of function of the GI tract prevents oral or enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition (PN) is used. PN is expensive, however, and carries a high risk of complications. IV nutrition therefore is reserved for situations in which no there are no other options for providing nutritional support. Examples of situations in which PN is indicated appear in Table 12 2. Although well-nourished patients with GI dysfunction can receive conventional IV fluids for 7 10 d without harmful effects, patients with existing nutritional deficits or metabolic stress and those not expected to resume oral intake for 5 10 d need PN within 3 5 d. The decision to initiate PN is not an emergency. Adverse effects of PN are less likely to occur in patients who have good glycemic control, stable hemodynamic status, and electrolyte levels within normal limits. Issues such as prognosis, possibility of benefit, and the patient's views regarding artificial feeding also are factors in the decision to begin PN.

Table 12 2 Indications for Parenteral Nutrition


CategoryExample
Conditions that impair absorption of nutrientsShort-bowel syndrome
Enterocutaneous fistula
Infectious colitis
Radiation or chemotherapy effects
Small-bowel obstruction
Need for bowel restInflammatory bowel disease
Ischemic bowel
Severe pancreatitis
Chylous fistula
Preoperative status
Motility disordersProlonged ileus, scleroderma, pseudoobstruction, visceral organ myopathy
Inability to achieve or maintain enteral accessUnstable clinical condition
Hyperemesis gravidarum
Eating disorders

Composition of PN Formulas

PN formulas are highly complex IV fluids containing the nutrients essential for metabolism and growth: protein, carbohydrates, lipids, electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements, and water. The composition of PN formulas can be tailored to meet the demands of hypermetabolic illness and to accommodate limitations in organ function.

Depending on hospital policy, PN formulas can be compounded in two ways. All of the ingredients can be mixed in a single container, a method called total nutrient admixture (TNA), or the lipid emulsion can be excluded from the primary solution and administered separately. (Lipid emulsions are isotonic and can be given safely by peripheral vein.) Although TNA offers many advantages over conventional dextrose/amino acid formulas, numerous factors affect the stability of the formula. The integrity of the PN formula is a critical consideration that demands the expertise of a pharmacist familiar with stability and compatibility data.

Protein:

Supplied as crystalline amino acids in a mix of essential and nonessential amino acids. Standard amino acid solutions are available in concentrations ranging from 3% to 15%, the upper range being used most frequently in adults. In general, 1 g of amino acids is equivalent to 1 g of protein. As with dietary protein, IV amino acids yield 4 kcal/g.

Manufacturers offer modified amino acids to meet disease- and age-specific requirements. For example, specialty formulas for renal failure contain increased amounts of essential amino acids or provide only essential amino acids. Hepatic failure amino acid mixtures contain higher amounts of branched-chain amino acids and decreased aromatic amino acids. Higher costs and conflicting scientific evidence on effectiveness limit the routine use of specialty amino acid mixtures.

Carbohydrate:

Dextrose monohydrate is the principal energy substrate in PN formulas. This form of carbohydrate provides 3.4 kcal in concentrations ranging from 3% to 70%. Studies have shown that dextrose dosages between 4 7 mg/kg/min provide optimal protein sparing, although hyperglycemia occurs less often when the dextrose infusion is limited to 4 mg/kg/min.

Fat:

IV fat emulsions contain soybean oil or a mixture of safflower and soybean oils with egg phospholipid added as an emulsifier. Patients allergic to eggs or soybeans may have reactions to lipid emulsions, including hives, back pain, shortness of breath, and anaphylactic shock. Lipid emulsions are available in concentrations of 10%, 20%, and 30% providing 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0 kcal/mL, respectively. More efficient lipid clearance occurs with 20% fat emulsions than with 10% products, making the 20% form preferable, especially for pediatric patients. Provision of 1 4% of the patient's daily energy requirements as lipid emulsion prevents essential fatty acid deficiency, a condition that causes dry skin, hair loss, poor wound healing, and diarrhea after weeks to months of fat-free parenteral feedings. However, in current practice patients typically receive up to 50% of parenteral calories as fat. Current guidelines for adults set the daily limit for lipid dose at 2.5 g/kg, but a growing body of evidence suggests that 1 g/kg may be a safer limit. The ability to furnish a more balanced fuel mix decreases the adverse effects associated with infusing large amounts of dextrose. However, patients with a triglyceride level 400 mg/dL should not receive lipid emulsions. Monitor triglyceride level to determine whether lipid emulsion can safely be introduced at a later time. On the other hand, a history of type IV hypertriglyceridemia is an absolute contraindication to use of IV fat emulsions.

Electrolytes:

PN formulas must contain sufficient electrolytes for critical metabolic activities. The usual electrolyte profile of PN formulas is sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, acetate, and phosphorus. Unlike conventional IV fluids, electrolyte PN formulas contain the acetate or chloride salt of the electrolyte to help maintain acid base balance. Sodium bicarbonate is used in PN but may precipitate additives, particularly calcium and magnesium. In most cases, hospital pharmacies offer a standard electrolyte product that provides typical maintenance doses of electrolytes. Table 12 3 lists daily electrolyte requirements for adult patients in stable condition. Patients with diarrhea, fistula output, and gastric losses often have altered electrolyte homeostasis and need higher levels of certain electrolytes. On the other hand, the electrolyte content of the PN formula may have to be restricted if a patient has impaired renal function.

Table 12 3 Electrolytes for Parenteral Nutrition


ElectrolyteFormRecommended Daily Requirement
SodiumSodium chloride1 2 mEq/kg
Sodium acetate
Sodium phosphate
PotassiumPotassium chloride1 2 mEq/kg
Potassium acetate
Potassium phosphate
ChlorideSodium chlorideAs needed for acid base balance
Potassium chloride
AcetateSodium acetateAs needed for acid base balance
Potassium acetate
PhosphateSodium phosphate20 40 mmol
Potassium phosphate
MagnesiumMagnesium sulfate8 20 mEq
CalciumCalcium gluconate10 15 mEq

Vitamins:

All PN formulas must contain the vitamins needed to support normal metabolism. Life-threatening vitamin deficiencies can develop within 2 3 wk in patients who receive PN without vitamins. Table 12 4 lists the composition of a typical parenteral vitamin product for adults. Individual vitamin products, such as A, C, and folic acid, are used to supplement the standard multivitamin combination when a disease-specific or treatment-related deficiency exists.

Table 12 4 Parenteral Vitamin Formulas


VitaminDose/10 mL
A (retinol)1 mg (3300 IU)
B1 (thiamin)
 
6 mg
B2 (riboflavin)
 
3.6 mg
B3 (niacin)
 
40 mg
B6 (pyridoxine)
 
6 mg
B12 (cobalamin)
 
5 mcg
Biotin60 mcg
C (ascorbic acid)200 mg
D (ergocalciferol)5 mcg (200 IU)
E (tocopherol)10 IU
Folic acid600 mcg
K150 mcg

Trace Minerals:

Trace minerals are essential for efficient substrate utilization and other supportive functions. Typical PN solutions contain zinc, chromium, copper, and manganese according to established guidelines. Table 12 5 shows dosing recommendations for trace minerals. Patients receiving long-term PN also need selenium to prevent potentially fatal cardiomyopathy. Commercial trace mineral products do not contain iron. In the past, iron was frequently added to PN formulas in the form of iron dextran, but this practice has fallen out of favor because of concerns about the potential for adverse reactions to IV iron. Current guidelines call for administering iron as a separate infusion as needed. Clinical conditions that impair trace mineral excretion may necessitate restricting certain trace minerals in PN formulas. For example, in patients with biliary disease copper and manganese must be restricted from PN formulas to avoid toxicity.

Table 12 5 Trace Element Requirements for Parenteral Nutrition


ElementRecommended Daily Dose
Zinc2.5 5.0 mga
 
Copper0.3 0.5 mg
Selenium20 60 mcg
Chromium10 15 mcg
Manganese60 100 mcg

aRequirements may be as high as 15 mg/d in stress states or in patients with high-output fistulas.

Central versus Peripheral Administration

PN formulas that rely on glucose as a primary energy source frequently have an osmolarity that approaches 1800 mOsm/L, more than twice the limit for administration through peripheral veins. Safe infusion of such hypertonic fluids requires placement of an IV line in the central venous circulation, as described in Chapter 13. However, the osmolarity of PN formulas that contain lipid emulsion and low concentrations of dextrose may fall below 900 mOsm/L, making these formulas suitable for peripheral administration. Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) is appropriate for patients with adequate peripheral venous access who need PN for a brief time, usually less than 2 wk. Because peripheral PN formulas contain relatively low concentrations of nutrients, this form of nutritional support is more helpful in preventing malnutrition than in correcting existing deficits. For similar reasons, patients with elevated requirements due to hypermetabolism or those who need fluid restriction are not candidates for PPN.

Initiating and Managing Parenteral Nutrition

Beginning Parenteral Nutrition:

Because PN can induce metabolic disturbances or worsen existing problems, do not start PN until a patient has a stable fluid and electrolyte profile. It is usually unwise to begin PN in a patient who needs large amounts of fluid, may need resuscitation after trauma, or who is in a septic state. Recommended baseline laboratory tests are serum electrolytes (including ionized calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus), glucose, prealbumin, triglycerides, creatinine, BUN, and liver function tests. These measurements help identify whether the patient is at risk of metabolic complications and help guide the design of the initial PN formula.

Begin PN at a reduced level and advance to goal according to the patient's response. Because carbohydrate is the substrate most likely to induce metabolic disturbances, initial formulas frequently have a limited dextrose load, usually 200 250 g for the first day. Many institutional protocols allow patients to receive the target level of protein and lipid emulsion initially and increase dextrose to goal over 2 d. Some situations call for a more cautious introduction of PN. A patient with a baseline serum glucose level of 120 150 mg/dL, for example, should receive only 100 150 g of dextrose in an initial PN formula. Increase the dextrose in the PN formula over several days while closely observing serum glucose level and insulin requirements.

Refeeding Syndrome:

Beginning PN at a reduced level is prudent for patients at risk of refeeding syndrome, a life-threatening metabolic complication that occurs in the setting of severe weight loss or long-standing malnutrition. Risk factors for this problem include anorexia nervosa, chronic alcoholism, cancer cachexia, and other wasting syndromes. In refeeding syndrome, severe fluid and electrolyte disturbances occur in the first few days of therapy. The hallmark of refeeding syndrome is hypophosphatemia, which can be fatal if not recognized and corrected promptly. To avoid refeeding syndrome for patients at risk, current guidelines call for correcting phosphate levels 2.0 mEq/dL before beginning PN. In this setting, the initial PN formula should limit dextrose to 150 g and begin with only 50% of the patient's caloric requirements. Vigilant electrolyte replacement is essential and may take several days to achieve full repletion. Calorie and protein intake should progress to goal only when fluid and electrolyte status stabilizes.

Ordering PN:

Writing orders for PN is a step-by-step process that takes into account energy needs, nutrient requirements, and electrolyte status. The first step is to set goals for energy intake and to distribute the calories among the protein, carbohydrate, and fat in the PN formula. The following example illustrates these steps for a 70-kg man. The formula produced in this process is a reasonable estimated goal. This PN can then be adjusted to account for clinical circumstances that affect nutrient needs, such as severity of illness and organ function.

   

1. Establish goals for energy and protein intake.

   

a. Provide 25 30 kcal/kg. For a 70-kg man, the range is 1750 2100 kcal/d. (See Chapter 11 regarding use of adjusted body weight.) Start at the low end of the range to avoid overfeeding.

b. Give protein 1.0 1.5 g/kg, a range of 70 105 g/d for a 70-kg man. Round the goal to 100 g to meet the patient's needs and to simplify compounding.

2. Determine nonprotein calories. Subtract protein calories from total calories (100 x 4 kcal/g = 400 protein calories). Example: 1750 400 = 1350 nonprotein calories.

3. Determine carbohydrate dose. The standard lipid dose for most adult patients is 50 g or 500 kcal. Subtract lipid calories from nonprotein calories to determine the amount of dextrose needed to meet the patient's energy needs. Example: 1350 500 = 850 carbohydrate calories. Divide the calorie goal for carbohydrate by 3.4 cal/g. Example: 850 3.4 = 250 g.

4. Order the PN formula. Total energy, 1750 kcal; protein, 100 g; carbohydrate, 250 g; fat, 50 g. Safety guidelines for PN call for ordering substrates in grams to avoid confusion. (Some hospitals require that these values be converted to percent solutions in the PN order.) Consult with a pharmacist. As Table 12 6 shows, the identical PN formula can be adjusted to meet the patient's hydration requirements by use of different concentrations of amino acids, dextrose, and fat.

5. Make appropriate additions to PN formula. Individualize the electrolyte content of the PN formula according to the patient's laboratory tests and organ function. Sodium and potassium are available as both chloride and acetate salts. Using higher or lower amounts of these salts can help maintain acid base balance. Stability and compatibility limits exist for calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium. Many hospitals use standard formulations for vitamins and trace minerals to avoid the need to order each entity individually.

Table 12 6 Adjusting the Volume of Parenteral Nutrition Formulasa


Example FormulaStandard PNFluid RestrictionHigh Volume
Goal: 1750 kcal   
Protein: 100 g10% AA 1000 mL15% AA 500 mL10% AA 1000 mL
Dextrose: 250 gD50W 500 mL
 
D70W 357 mL
 
D25W 1000 mL
 
Lipid: 50 g 20% fat 250 mL30% fat 204 mL10% fat 500 mL
Volume1750 mL1265 mL2500 mL

aHighly concentrated or dilute formulas may affect stability of total nutrient admixture. AA = amino acids.

Monitoring Response to Therapy

Carefully monitor patients receiving PN to identify problems and to assess progress toward the therapeutic goal. Measure electrolytes, including calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus, daily until the levels are stable, and order weekly liver function tests and prealbumin and triglyceride levels. Measure blood glucose level by fingerstick every 6 h until the level is stable. Patients receiving insulin or tapering doses of steroids and those with changing clinical status may need closer blood glucose monitoring. Typical PN protocols call for weighing the patient daily and keeping accurate and intake and output records.

No single criterion is a reliable indicator of the effectiveness of PN. Because indicators of protein status are affected by illness, albumin and prealbumin levels are not reliable markers of response to therapy. Nitrogen balance studies do shed light on the adequacy of protein intake, particularly when serial studies are performed. Finally, clinical status is evidence that the a nutritional regimen is appropriate. Adequate wound healing, increased stamina, and improved functional status all suggest the nutritional regimen is meeting the patient's needs.

Preventing and Managing Complications

Hyperglycemia:

The most common metabolic complication of PN. Severe hyperglycemia causes osmotic diuresis that depletes electrolytes, especially potassium, sodium, and phosphorus. If left uncorrected, severe hyperglycemia can progress to hyperglycemic hyperosmolar nonketotic (HHNK) syndrome, a rare but potentially fatal condition. Advances in monitoring and delivery techniques have made HHNK an uncommon occurrence. Evidence that tight glucose control during PN greatly improves clinical outcome has made glycemic control a priority during PN therapy.

The goal is to maintain blood glucose level no higher than 120 mg/dL for critically ill patients and no higher than 150 mg/dL for patients in stable condition receiving PN. Keeping dextrose infusion rates 4 mg/kg/min decreases the incidence of hyperglycemia. Patients with diabetes mellitus and those who are critically ill often need insulin to control blood glucose level during PN. Insulin is stable and is compatible with PN formulas, although a portion of the dose adheres to the administration bags and tubing. Guidelines typically call for 0.05 0.1 units of regular insulin for each gram of dextrose in the PN formula. For example, for an initial dextrose dose of 200 g, 10 20 units of insulin would be added to the PN formula. Closely monitor blood glucose level, and provide additional subcutaneous insulin coverage as needed. The insulin in the PN formula should be increased in increments of 0.05 units per gram of dextrose or by adding of the subcutaneous insulin coverage for the previous 24 h to the next PN formula until blood glucose level stays within target range. In cases of extreme hyperglycemia or insulin resistance, a separate continuous insulin drip allows greater flexibility in controlling glucose levels. After glycemic control is achieved, increase the dextrose dose 50 g/d, to maintain the same insulin to dextrose ratio.

Hypoglycemia can develop in patients receiving PN formulas containing insulin. If the blood glucose level stays consistently < 80 100 mg/dL, reassess the insulin dose. This step is particularly necessary for patients with renal insufficiency, which delays insulin clearance, and for patients who are receiving tapering steroid doses. The following are guidelines for maintaining tight glucose control in patients receiving PN:

Blood Glucose Management with PN
Goal: Aim for glucose level of 80 120 mg/dL in critically ill patients. Goal for blood glucose for stable patients ranges from 100 to 150 mg/dL.
1. Order fingerstick blood glucose measurement q6h, with sliding scale insulin coverage. 
2. Use regular insulin. Do not use NPH or long-acting insulin to avoid fluctuation in blood glucose levels due to variation in drug action.
3. For patients with a history of diabetes or baseline blood glucose 120 150 mg/dL, limit initial dextrose dose to 150 g in PN. 
4. For patients with baseline blood glucose 150 200 mg/dL, limit initial dextrose dose to 150 g and add insulin 0.1 units/g dextrose (15 units). 
5. Review 24-h insulin coverage. Add two thirds of the insulin coverage to the next PN or increase insulin in PN by 0.05 units/g dextrose to a goal of 0.2 units/g dextrose. 
6. Consider using an insulin drip for blood glucose levels persistently > 200 mg/dL.
7. Maintain the insulin/dextrose ratio when increasing or decreasing dextrose in PN. 
8. Reassess insulin needs daily. Reduce insulin in PN 30 50% for blood glucose levels that drop below desired level.

Fluid and Electrolyte Disturbances:

Candidates for PN often have preexisting nutritional deficits and nutrient losses due to GI disorders, which make fluid and electrolyte shifts especially common in this population. The principles of fluid and electrolyte management for patients receiving PN are similar to those for any patient. In cases in which fluid restriction is called for, PN formulas can contain the most concentrated form of the nutrients to reduce the volume of the solution.

Hepatobiliary Complications:

Abnormalities of hepatic function occur frequently in patients receiving PN. Early in therapy adults may have mild, transient elevations in liver enzymes that resolve when PN stops. However, neonates and patients receiving long-term PN may experience progressive, irreversible hepatic failure. Research findings show a strong association between excessive carbohydrate administration and liver dysfunction during PN. A number of additional risk factors have emerged, suggesting a multifactorial cause of PN-related hepatic dysfunction. PN also places recipients at risk of cholelithiasis, particularly patients who cannot tolerate any oral or enteral nutrition.

Strategies for preventing and managing hepatic complications of PN include avoiding overfeeding, limiting dextrose dose to 30 50% of calories, providing 10 30% of calories as lipid, infusing PN over 12 16 h thus giving "time off" to mimic a postabsorptive state, and avoiding complete bowel rest if possible. Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid may help patients with cholestasis.

Pulmonary Complications:

The CO2 produced by carbohydrate metabolism can place added stress on patients with CO2 retention and those who are being weaned from mechanical ventilation. To avoid problems related to CO2 production, the formula must meet, not exceed, the patient's requirements. In addition to avoiding overfeeding, reducing the carbohydrate dose and increasing the proportion of calories provided as fat can help prevent adverse pulmonary effects of PN.

Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection:

PN increases the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI). Meticulous protocols for the insertion and maintenance of central venous catheters can greatly reduce the risk of this serious complication. CR-BSI may necessitate removal of the vascular access device or treatment with antibiotics, depending on the type of catheter, clinical status of the patient, and type of organism isolated from the patient's blood. Unexplained fever or elevated WBC count in a patient receiving PN should raise suspicion concerning CR-BSI.

Terminating Therapy

When oral or enteral intake resumes, patients should gradually receive fewer nutrients parenterally. Some clinicians infuse PN only at night in an effort to minimize the risk of rebound hypoglycemia, but no results of controlled trials exist to support this practice. There is rarely a need for a formal schedule of weaning from PN. If concerns about rebound hypoglycemia exist, a 5% dextrose solution can be infused after PN is discontinued.


Copyright 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Notice. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Notice.  Additional Credits and Copyright Information.


mcgraw-hill education a silverchair information system the mcgraw-hill companies



Clinician's Pocket Reference
Clinicians Pocket Reference, 11th Edition
ISBN: 0071454284
EAN: 2147483647
Year: 2004
Pages: 30

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net