21.7 Boundaryless Virtual Teams


19.5 Analysis of Net Present Value

The ROI of using the Software Inspection Process to produce 10,000 lines of code is 2,542% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $2,767,464 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $82,073 are subtracted, and the adjusted NPV benefits of $2,086,307 are divided by the special costs of $82,073. The result is multiplied by 100%.

The ROI of using the Personal Software Process SM to help produce 10,000 lines of code is 3,217% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $4,469,997 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $105,600 are subtracted. The adjusted NPV benefits of $3,396,760 are divided by the special costs of $105,600. The result is multiplied by 100%.

The ROI of using the Team Software Process SM to help produce 10,000 lines of code is 2,192% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $4,341,496 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $148,400 are subtracted. The adjusted NPV benefits of $3,253,276 are divided by the special costs of $148,400. The result is multiplied by 100%.

The ROI of using the Software Capability Maturity Model to help produce 10,000 lines of code is 661% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $3,023,064 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $311,433 are subtracted. The adjusted NPV benefits of $2,057,216 are divided by the special costs of $311,433. The result is multiplied by 100%.

The ROI of using ISO 9001 to help produce 10,000 lines of code is 158% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $569,841 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $173,000 are subtracted. The adjusted NPV benefits of $273,485 are divided by the special costs of $173,000. The result is multiplied by 100%.

The ROI of using Capability Maturity Model Integration to help produce 10,000 lines of code is 114% using NPV. This is obtained by dividing the benefits of $3,023,064 by the devaluation rate of 1.27628156. The special costs of $1,108,233 are subtracted. The adjusted NPV benefits of $1,260,416 are divided by the special costs of $1,108,233. The result is multiplied by 100%. Table 42 illustrates the analysis of NPV.

Table 42: Analysis of Net Present Value

SPI Method

NPV

Normalized

Inspection

2,542%

0.79

Personal Software Process SM

3,217%

1.00

Team Software Process SM

2,192%

0.68

Software Capability Maturity Model

661%

0.21

ISO 9001

158%

0.05

Capability Maturity Model Integration

114%

0.04

The SPI method with the highest NPV is the Personal Software Process SM at 3,217%. The SPI method with the lowest NPV is Capability Maturity Model Integration at 114%. All of the SPI methods have an NPV above 100%. The Personal Software Process SM , Software Inspection Process, and Team Software Process SM have an NPV of 3,217, 2,542, and 2,192%, respectively. On a normalized scale, the Personal Software Process SM has the highest NPV. ISO 9001 and Capability Maturity Model Integration have the lowest NPV on a normalized scale.




ROI of Software Process Improvement. Metrics for Project Managers and Software Engineers
ROI of Software Process Improvement: Metrics for Project Managers and Software Engineers
ISBN: 193215924X
EAN: 2147483647
Year: 2004
Pages: 145

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net