190.

[Cover] [Contents] [Index]

Page 269

Figure 6.22 (a) The change in overall image energy at each iteration of ICM. (b) Energy change in terms of MPM. (c) Energy change using SA.

systems (i.e. clique c=2) were considered, and we used the isotropic assumption, i.e. β={1.5, 1.5, 1.5, 1.5}. The results shown in Plate 3b–d provide a more patch-like classification, and also show an improvement in accuracy. It is also apparent that the results from SA and MPM show larger

[Cover] [Contents] [Index]