| Question 1 | You are the network administrator for a large hospital. You have recently added a new business unit to your organization and need to create a new global address list (GAL) for this new business unit. Assuming that the Exchange recipients in this new business unit are members of the default GAL and also have access to the default GAL, which GAL will they see in Outlook when attempting to address email messages? A. The GAL for the new business unit only B. The default GAL only C. The GAL for the new business unit and the default GAL D. The GAL that each recipient chooses to see
|
| A1: | Answer B is correct. Because all members of the new GAL are also members of and have access to the default GAL, they will see the default GAL displayed in Outlook when addressing a new email message. The following order is used to determine which GAL is displayed: The GAL to which the user has access, the GAL in which the user is a member, or the GAL that is the largest. The default GAL is the largest GAL in the Exchange organization. The users would only see the GAL for the new business unit if they did not have access to or were members of the default GAL; they would see the new GAL, thus answer A is incorrect. Answer C is incorrect because only one GAL will be displayed. Answer D is incorrect because users do not have a choice as to which GAL they will see. |
| Question 2 | You are the network administrator for a large hospital. Your organization has 14 different departments and business units. You want each department or business to have an address list that contains all its users, contacts, and distribution groups. You want these address lists to be available for use by members of any department. What type of address lists do you need to create? A. Global address lists B. Default address lists C. Offline address lists D. Custom address lists
|
| A2: | Answer D is correct. You need to create a custom address list for each department and business unit with an LDAP query that limits list membership by department. Answer A is incorrect; users cannot view multiple global address lists. Answer B is incorrect because you cannot create additional default address lists. Answer C is incorrect. You might indeed need to create offline address lists as well for these departments and business units, but this was not the scope of the question. |
| Question 3 | You are the network administrator for a large hospital. Your organization has 14 different departments and business units. Each department or business unit has been assigned a specific mailbox store on one of four different Exchange Server 2003 servers in your organization. Users in all departments and business units frequently travel to remote locations and take company laptop computers with them. Your Exchange organization has the default GAL and offline address lists and a custom address list for each department or business unit. The majority of corporate email messages are sent from one user to another within the same department or business unit. What can you do to improve your users' experiences when they are working away from the office in a remote location? A. Create a new GAL for each department and link it to the respective mailbox store. B. Create a new offline address list for each department and link it to the respective mailbox store. C. Create a new mailbox store and move all users with portable computers to the new mailbox store. D. Create a new public folder store and make it accessible via Outlook Web Access (OWA).
|
| A3: | Answer B is correct. The best thing to do to improve the user experience for your traveling users is to create a new offline address list for each department or business unit and configure the respective mailbox store to use that offline address list. Answer A is incorrect. Creating a new GAL does not meet the requirement that users be able to see the address list from each department or business unit. Answer C is incorrect. Creating a new mailbox store specifically for users who travel with portable computers will do nothing to improve the users' experiences. Answer D is incorrect. Creating a public folder store and implementing OWA does not directly provide any relief for the users. |
| Question 4 | You need to create several custom address lists that must be hidden completely from view of all departments in your company with the exception of the Legal department. The address lists are for the Contracts, Litigation, and Rights Management divisions of the Legal department. How should you go about creating and hiding these custom address lists from all other departments? A. Configure the security properties for each of these three address lists with the Deny setting on the Open Address List permission for all other departments. Do nothing further. B. Create a new Address List container and configure the Deny setting on its security properties to deny access to all other departments. Place these three custom address lists in this container. C. Create an empty custom address list and configure the security properties of it with the Deny setting on the Open Address List permission for all other departments. Create the three new address lists under this address list. D. Create an empty GAL and configure the security properties of it with the Deny setting on the Open Address List permission for all other departments. Create the three new address lists under this address list.
|
| A4: | Answer C is correct. To completely hide custom address lists from users, you must place them under an empty address list that has the Deny setting configured on the Open Address List permission. Users will be able to see this empty address list, but nothing below it. Answer A is incorrect. Directly configuring the Deny setting on the Open Address List permission on each of the address lists without placing them under an empty list prevents users from seeing the membership of the address lists, but does not prevent them from seeing the address lists themselves. Answer B is incorrect. You cannot create additional address list containers. Answer D is incorrect. You cannot place nested address lists under a GAL. |
| Question 5 | You have recently created several new recipient policies for your Exchange organization that affect recipient email addresses and need to have them implemented as soon as possible. Your Exchange organization consists of five Exchange Server 2003 computers located all in one domain, routing group, and administrative group. Your Active Directory domain name is corp.bighospital.com. How will you go about getting these new recipient policies applied as soon as possible? A. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (CORP) object and select Update from the context menu. B. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (Enterprise) object and select Update from the context menu. C. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (CORP) object and select Rebuild from the context menu. D. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (Enterprise) object and select Rebuild from the context menu.
|
| A5: | Answer C is correct. There are two instances of the Recipient Update Service that are created when Exchange is installed. The Recipient Update Service (ActiveDirectoryDomain) instance is created once in each Active Directory domain that has an installation of Exchange 2000 Server or Exchange Server 2003 located in it. This RUS instance is responsible for updating the email addresses for recipient objects that are located in Active Directory based on the changes made to recipient objects in that domain. In addition, you can manually have RUS perform two different types of actions: update and rebuild. A rebuild operation forces all address list memberships to be recalculated. This is a more intensive operation and should typically only be performed when major changes have been made to the Exchange organization. Typical changes that would necessitate a rebuild operation include changing to SMTP addresses or changing the DNS domain name. You should perform a rebuild operation only during off-peak hours to minimize the impact on user mailbox access. An update operation forces all address list memberships to be recalculated for recently modified Exchange recipients. You should use an update operation to make recently created mailboxes available immediately, thus answer A is incorrect. The Recipient Update Service (EnterpriseConfiguration) instance is responsible for updating the email addresses of recipient objects that are located in the configuration partition of Active Directory. These objects include the Exchange Information Store object, the System Attendant object, and the Message Transfer Agent (MTA) object, thus answers B and D are incorrect. |
| Question 6 | You have recently created several dozen new mailbox-enabled user accounts within your organization and need to have them available for full use as soon as possible. Your Exchange organization consists of five Exchange Server 2003 computers located all in one domain, routing group, and administrative group. Your Active Directory domain name is corp.bighospital.com. How will you go about getting these new recipient policies applied as soon as possible? A. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (CORP) object and select Update from the context menu. B. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (Enterprise) object and select Update from the context menu. C. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (CORP) object and select Rebuild from the context menu. D. You should right-click on the Recipient Update Service (Enterprise) object and select Rebuild from the context menu.
|
| A6: | Answer A is correct. There are two instances of the Recipient Update Service that are created when Exchange is installed. The Recipient Update Service (ActiveDirectoryDomain) instance is created once in each Active Directory domain that has an installation of Exchange 2000 Server or Exchange Server 2003 located in it. This RUS instance is responsible for updating the email addresses for recipient objects that are located in Active Directory based on the changes made to recipient objects in that domain. In addition, you can manually have RUS perform two different types of actions: update and rebuild. An update operation forces all address list memberships to be recalculated for recently modified Exchange recipients. You should use an update operation to make recently created mailboxes available immediately. A rebuild operation forces all address list memberships to be recalculated. This is a more intensive operation and should typically only be performed when major changes have been made to the Exchange organization. Typical changes that would necessitate a rebuild operation include changing to SMTP addresses or changing the DNS domain name, thus answer C is incorrect. You should perform a rebuild operation only during off-peak hours to minimize the impact on user mailbox access. The Recipient Update Service (EnterpriseConfiguration) instance is responsible for updating the email addresses of recipient objects that are located in the configuration partition of Active Directory. These objects include the Exchange Information Store object, the System Attendant object, and the Message Transfer Agent (MTA) object, thus answers B and D are incorrect. |
| Question 7 | You have recently installed and configured a new Exchange Server 2003 organization consisting of two Exchange Server 2003 computers. Your organization has six mailbox stores and two public folder stores spread evenly over the two servers. Both servers are located in the same domain, routing group, and administrative group. The size of the Exchange databases is growing rapidly and threatens to consume all available disk space on your servers. What two things could you do to remedy this problem? A. Create a mailbox store policy that configures limits for mailbox stores. Apply this policy to all of your mailbox stores. B. Create a mailbox store policy that configures limits for mailbox stores. Apply this policy to only the mailbox stores that are using the most disk space. C. Create a public folder store policy that configures limits for mailbox stores. Apply this policy to all of your public folder stores. D. Create a recipient policy that specifies mailbox manager settings of 30 days and 1024KB for all folders. Apply this policy by manually running the Recipient Update Service.
|
| A7: | Answers A and C are correct. To reign in your users, and easily control disk space usage, your best bet is to create and apply a mailbox store policy and a public folder store policy that specify limits. Answer B is incorrect because selectively applying the mailbox store policy will likely lead to problems and will not provide a good solution to your problem. Answer D is incorrect. A recipient policy will not provide you with the solution you need, which is to control users' disk space usage by imposing limits. |
| Question 8 | You have had several instances in the past in which users have deleted items from their Outlook inboxes and then later needed to recover them. These instances have occurred typically around the 45 to 60 day time frame after the message had initially been deleted; thus, the messages were unavailable. You have been directed by your CEO to modify the deleted item retention period to 60 days. Because you have more than 30 mailbox stores for which you are responsible, you have decided to use a mailbox store policy to accomplish this task. From what tab of the policy will you be able to perform this configuration action? A. General B. Database C. Limits D. Full-Text Indexing
|
| A8: | Answer C is correct. The Limits tab allows you to configure retention limits for deleted items and deleted mailboxes, as well as mailbox size limits. Answer A is incorrect; the General tab allows you to configure items such as the default public folder store or the default offline address list for the mailbox store. Answer B is incorrect; the Database tab allows you to configure the database maintenance interval. Answer D is incorrect; the Full-Text Indexing tab allows you to configure the update interval for full-test indexing of the mailbox store. |
| Question 9 | You are the Exchange administrator for your company's network. You are responsible for six Exchange Server 2003 computers with 18 mailbox stores and 3 public folder stores. All of your Exchange servers are located in the same domain, administrative group, and routing group. You have one mailbox store policy that configures all mailbox store property pages and one public folder store policy that configures all public folder store property pages. Your users come from 16 different departments and are randomly assigned to mailbox stores. Recently, you have been asked by several employees in the Marketing department to increase their mailbox store limits because they commonly send and receive email messages both internally and externally that contain large attachments. You want to grant the users in the Marketing department larger mailbox store limits but still enforce the existing limits on all other users. What two actions should you perform to accomplish this task and also create a better organized Exchange organization? A. Create one new mailbox store and move all Marketing department users into this new store. B. Reassign all users to mailbox stores by department, thus resulting in all users from a single department being in a single mailbox store. C. Create a new mailbox store policy that imposes the limits required by the Marketing department and apply it to their mailbox store. D. Modify the existing mailbox store policy Limits tab to enforce the desired limits for the Marketing department.
|
| A9: | Answers B and C are correct. The problems you are given to solve in this question are twofold. First, you must provide the Marketing department users with the increased limits they required. Second, you want to better organize your Exchange organization from its current state in which users are randomly assigned to any mailbox store. To solve both of these problems, the best solution is to move all users into mailbox stores by department (you might need to create multiple mailbox stores for larger departments to increase server performance) and also to create a new mailbox store policy that addresses the need for increased limits for the Marketing department. Answer A is incorrect. Creating a single new mailbox store and moving all Marketing department users into it would make it easier to apply a mailbox store policy to them, thus providing them with the required limits, but it does not address the other problem of making the Exchange organization more organized. Answer D is incorrect. Modifying the existing mailbox store policy to provide the limits required by the Marketing department would not meet the requirement that all users are to have the same limits. |
| Question 10 | Your company, Just Frogs, has recently acquired another company, Confrogso. You have created new user accounts for all former Confrogso employees. You need all Confrogso employees to be able to receive email at their former Confrogso email addresses and at their new Just Frogs email address. In addition, all emails sent by former Confrogso employees must display their new Just Frogs email address. The user accounts of all former Confrogso employees are configured with a company name of Confrogso/Just Frogs. The user accounts of all existing Just Frogs employees are configured with a company name of Just Frogs. How can you provide the former Confrogso employees with the ability to receive email at both their old and new email addresses in the most administratively efficient fashion? A. Configure a new mailbox store policy that applies a second SMTP address to the former Confrogso employees using the @confrogso.com domain. Ensure that the SMTP address in the @justfrogs.com domain is the primary SMTP address. Filter the mailbox store policy by the User Company attribute. B. Configure a new mailbox store policy that applies a second SMTP address to the former Confrogso employees using the @confrogso.com domain. Ensure that the SMTP address in the @justfrogs.com domain is the primary SMTP address. C. Create a new recipient policy that applies a second SMTP address to the former Confrogso employees using the @confrogso.com domain. Ensure that the SMTP address in the @justfrogs.com domain is the primary SMTP address. Filter the mailbox store policy by the User Company attribute. D. Create a new recipient policy that applies a second SMTP address to the former Confrogso employees using the @justfrogs.com domain. Ensure that the SMTP address in the @confrogso.com domain is the primary SMTP address. Filter the mailbox store policy by the User Company attribute.
|
| A10: | Answer C is correct. You need to create a new recipient policy that adds a new SMTP address for these users in the @confrogso.com domain. This SMTP address should be the secondary SMTP address, which it is by default (you would have to manually make it the primary SMTP address). During the LDAP query creation process, you can filter the recipients who will receive this policy by the User Company attribute. Because you have configured the former Confrogso employees with a company name of Confrogso/Just Frogs, you can create the filter using the User Company field with the Starts with condition and a value of Confrogso. This results in only those users with a value of Confrogso in the beginning of their User Company attribute having the recipient policy applied. Answer A is incorrect. A mailbox store policy cannot be used to add a second SMTP address. Answer B is incorrect. Filtering must be done to ensure that the recipient policy is only applied to the users who require it, in this case the former employees of Confrogso. Answer D is incorrect. The primary SMTP address must be in the @justfrogs.com domain. |
