Section 15.8. Semaphores

team bbl


15.8. Semaphores

A semaphore isn't a form of IPC similar to the others that we've described (pipes, FIFOs, and message queues). A semaphore is a counter used to provide access to a shared data object for multiple processes.

The Single UNIX Specification includes an alternate set of semaphore interfaces in the semaphore option of its real-time extensions. We do not discuss these interfaces in this text.

To obtain a shared resource, a process needs to do the following:

  1. Test the semaphore that controls the resource.

  2. If the value of the semaphore is positive, the process can use the resource. In this case, the process decrements the semaphore value by 1, indicating that it has used one unit of the resource.

  3. Otherwise, if the value of the semaphore is 0, the process goes to sleep until the semaphore value is greater than 0. When the process wakes up, it returns to step 1.

When a process is done with a shared resource that is controlled by a semaphore, the semaphore value is incremented by 1. If any other processes are asleep, waiting for the semaphore, they are awakened.

To implement semaphores correctly, the test of a semaphore's value and the decrementing of this value must be an atomic operation. For this reason, semaphores are normally implemented inside the kernel.

A common form of semaphore is called a binary semaphore. It controls a single resource, and its value is initialized to 1. In general, however, a semaphore can be initialized to any positive value, with the value indicating how many units of the shared resource are available for sharing.

XSI semaphores are, unfortunately, more complicated than this. Three features contribute to this unnecessary complication.

  1. A semaphore is not simply a single non-negative value. Instead, we have to define a semaphore as a set of one or more semaphore values. When we create a semaphore, we specify the number of values in the set.

  2. The creation of a semaphore (semget) is independent of its initialization (semctl). This is a fatal flaw, since we cannot atomically create a new semaphore set and initialize all the values in the set.

  3. Since all forms of XSI IPC remain in existence even when no process is using them, we have to worry about a program that terminates without releasing the semaphores it has been allocated. The undo feature that we describe later is supposed to handle this.

The kernel maintains a semid_ds structure for each semaphore set:

    struct semid_ds {      struct ipc_perm  sem_perm;  /* see Section 15.6.2 */      unsigned short   sem_nsems; /* # of semaphores in set */      time_t           sem_otime; /* last-semop() time */      time_t           sem_ctime; /* last-change time */      .      .      .    }; 

The Single UNIX Specification defines the fields shown, but implementations can define additional members in the semid_ds structure.

Each semaphore is represented by an anonymous structure containing at least the following members:

    struct {      unsigned short  semval;   /* semaphore value, always >= 0 */      pid_t           sempid;   /* pid for last operation */      unsigned short  semncnt;  /* # processes awaiting semval>curval */      unsigned short  semzcnt;  /* # processes awaiting semval==0 */      .      .      .    }; 

Figure 15.28 lists the system limits (Section 15.6.3) that affect semaphore sets.

Figure 15.28. System limits that affect semaphores

Description

Typical values

FreeBSD 5.2.1

Linux 2.4.22

Mac OS X 10.3

Solaris 9

The maximum value of any semaphore

32,767

32,767

32,767

32,767

The maximum value of any semaphore's adjust-on-exit value

16,384

32,767

16,384

16,384

The maximum number of semaphore sets, systemwide

10

128

87,381

10

The maximum number of semaphores, systemwide

60

32,000

87,381

60

The maximum number of semaphores per semaphore set

60

250

87,381

25

The maximum number of undo structures, systemwide

30

32,000

87,381

30

The maximum number of undo entries per undo structures

10

32

10

10

The maximum number of operations per semop call

100

32

100

10


The first function to call is semget to obtain a semaphore ID.

 #include <sys/sem.h> int semget(key_t key, int nsems, int flag); 

Returns: semaphore ID if OK, 1 on error


In Section 15.6.1, we described the rules for converting the key into an identifier and discussed whether a new set is created or an existing set is referenced. When a new set is created, the following members of the semid_ds structure are initialized.

  • The ipc_perm structure is initialized as described in Section 15.6.2. The mode member of this structure is set to the corresponding permission bits of flag. These permissions are specified with the values from Figure 15.24.

  • sem_otime is set to 0.

  • sem_ctime is set to the current time.

  • sem_nsems is set to nsems.

The number of semaphores in the set is nsems. If a new set is being created (typically in the server), we must specify nsems. If we are referencing an existing set (a client), we can specify nsems as 0.

The semctl function is the catchall for various semaphore operations.

 #include <sys/sem.h> int semctl(int semid, int semnum, int  cmd,            ... /* union semun arg */); 

Returns: (see following)


The fourth argument is optional, depending on the command requested, and if present, is of type semun, a union of various command-specific arguments:

    union semun {      int              val;    /* for SETVAL */      struct semid_ds *buf;    /* for IPC_STAT and IPC_SET */      unsigned short  *array;  /* for GETALL and SETALL */    }; 

Note that the optional argument is the actual union, not a pointer to the union.

The cmd argument specifies one of the following ten commands to be performed on the set specified by semid. The five commands that refer to one particular semaphore value use semnum to specify one member of the set. The value of semnum is between 0 and nsems-1, inclusive.

IPC_STAT

Fetch the semid_ds structure for this set, storing it in the structure pointed to by arg.buf.

IPC_SET

Set the sem_perm.uid, sem_perm.gid, and sem_perm.mode fields from the structure pointed to by arg.buf in the semid_ds structure associated with this set. This command can be executed only by a process whose effective user ID equals sem_perm.cuid or sem_perm.uid or by a process with superuser privileges.

IPC_RMID

Remove the semaphore set from the system. This removal is immediate. Any other process still using the semaphore will get an error of EIDRM on its next attempted operation on the semaphore. This command can be executed only by a process whose effective user ID equals sem_perm.cuid or sem_perm.uid or by a process with superuser privileges.

GETVAL

Return the value of semval for the member semnum.

SETVAL

Set the value of semval for the member semnum. The value is specified by arg.val.

GETPID

Return the value of sempid for the member semnum.

GETNCNT

Return the value of semncnt for the member semnum.

GETZCNT

Return the value of semzcnt for the member semnum.

GETALL

Fetch all the semaphore values in the set. These values are stored in the array pointed to by arg.array.

SETALL

Set all the semaphore values in the set to the values pointed to by arg.array.


For all the GET commands other than GETALL, the function returns the corresponding value. For the remaining commands, the return value is 0.

The function semop atomically performs an array of operations on a semaphore set.

[View full width]

 #include <sys/sem.h> int semop(int semid, struct sembuf semoparray[],  size_t nops); 

Returns: 0 if OK, 1 on error


The semoparray argument is a pointer to an array of semaphore operations, represented by sembuf structures:

  struct sembuf {    unsigned short  sem_num;  /* member # in set (0, 1, ..., nsems-1) */    short           sem_op;   /* operation (negative, 0, or positive) */    short           sem_flg;  /* IPC_NOWAIT, SEM_UNDO */  }; 

The nops argument specifies the number of operations (elements) in the array.

The operation on each member of the set is specified by the corresponding sem_op value. This value can be negative, 0, or positive. (In the following discussion, we refer to the "undo" flag for a semaphore. This flag corresponds to the SEM_UNDO bit in the corresponding sem_flg member.)

  1. The easiest case is when sem_op is positive. This case corresponds to the returning of resources by the process. The value of sem_op is added to the semaphore's value. If the undo flag is specified, sem_op is also subtracted from the semaphore's adjustment value for this process.

  2. If sem_op is negative, we want to obtain resources that the semaphore controls.

    If the semaphore's value is greater than or equal to the absolute value of sem_op (the resources are available), the absolute value of sem_op is subtracted from the semaphore's value. This guarantees that the resulting value for the semaphore is greater than or equal to 0. If the undo flag is specified, the absolute value of sem_op is also added to the semaphore's adjustment value for this process.

    If the semaphore's value is less than the absolute value of sem_op (the resources are not available), the following conditions apply.

    1. If IPC_NOWAIT is specified, semop returns with an error of EAGAIN.

    2. If IPC_NOWAIT is not specified, the semncnt value for this semaphore is incremented (since the caller is about to go to sleep), and the calling process is suspended until one of the following occurs.

      1. The semaphore's value becomes greater than or equal to the absolute value of sem_op (i.e., some other process has released some resources). The value of semncnt for this semaphore is decremented (since the calling process is done waiting), and the absolute value of sem_op is subtracted from the semaphore's value. If the undo flag is specified, the absolute value of sem_op is also added to the semaphore's adjustment value for this process.

      2. The semaphore is removed from the system. In this case, the function returns an error of EIDRM.

      3. A signal is caught by the process, and the signal handler returns. In this case, the value of semncnt for this semaphore is decremented (since the calling process is no longer waiting), and the function returns an error of EINTR.

  3. If sem_op is 0, this means that the calling process wants to wait until the semaphore's value becomes 0.

    If the semaphore's value is currently 0, the function returns immediately.

    If the semaphore's value is nonzero, the following conditions apply.

    1. If IPC_NOWAIT is specified, return is made with an error of EAGAIN.

    2. If IPC_NOWAIT is not specified, the semzcnt value for this semaphore is incremented (since the caller is about to go to sleep), and the calling process is suspended until one of the following occurs.

      1. The semaphore's value becomes 0. The value of semzcnt for this semaphore is decremented (since the calling process is done waiting).

      2. The semaphore is removed from the system. In this case, the function returns an error of EIDRM.

      3. A signal is caught by the process, and the signal handler returns. In this case, the value of semzcnt for this semaphore is decremented (since the calling process is no longer waiting), and the function returns an error of EINTR.

The semop function operates atomically; it does either all the operations in the array or none of them.

Semaphore Adjustment on exit

As we mentioned earlier, it is a problem if a process terminates while it has resources allocated through a semaphore. Whenever we specify the SEM_UNDO flag for a semaphore operation and we allocate resources (a sem_op value less than 0), the kernel remembers how many resources we allocated from that particular semaphore (the absolute value of sem_op). When the process terminates, either voluntarily or involuntarily, the kernel checks whether the process has any outstanding semaphore adjustments and, if so, applies the adjustment to the corresponding semaphore.

If we set the value of a semaphore using semctl, with either the SETVAL or SETALL commands, the adjustment value for that semaphore in all processes is set to 0.

ExampleTiming Comparison of Semaphores versus Record Locking

If we are sharing a single resource among multiple processes, we can use either a semaphore or record locking. It's interesting to compare the timing differences between the two techniques.

With a semaphore, we create a semaphore set consisting of a single member and initialize the semaphore's value to 1. To allocate the resource, we call semop with a sem_op of -1; to release the resource, we perform a sem_op of +1. We also specify SEM_UNDO with each operation, to handle the case of a process that terminates without releasing its resource.

With record locking, we create an empty file and use the first byte of the file (which need not exist) as the lock byte. To allocate the resource, we obtain a write lock on the byte; to release it, we unlock the byte. The properties of record locking guarantee that if a process terminates while holding a lock, then the lock is automatically released by the kernel.

Figure 15.29 shows the time required to perform these two locking techniques on Linux. In each case, the resource was allocated and then released 100,000 times. This was done simultaneously by three different processes. The times in Figure 15.29 are the totals in seconds for all three processes.

On Linux, there is about a 60 percent penalty in the elapsed time for record locking compared to semaphore locking.

Even though record locking is slower than semaphore locking, if we're locking a single resource (such as a shared memory segment) and don't need all the fancy features of XSI semaphores, record locking is preferred. The reasons are that it is much simpler to use, and the system takes care of any lingering locks when a process terminates.

Figure 15.29. Timing comparison of locking alternatives on Linux

Operation

User

System

Clock

semaphores with undo

0.38

0.48

0.86

advisory record locking

0.41

0.95

1.36


    team bbl



    Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment
    Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment, Second Edition (Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series)
    ISBN: 0321525949
    EAN: 2147483647
    Year: 2005
    Pages: 370

    flylib.com © 2008-2017.
    If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net