Tool 94: Idea Borrowing


AKA

N/A

Classification

Idea Generting (IG)

Tool description

The idea borrowing technique allows team participants to bring to the surface ideas from inside and outside the organization or through their own creativity. Team-established criteria is used to rate and select the top-rated ideas considered for implementing.

Typical application

  • To surface best practices, technological innovations, and perceived good ideas.

  • To supplement brainstorming and benchmarking activities.

  • To stimulate the creativity of employees.

Problem-solving phase

Select and define problem or opportunity

Identify and analyze causes or potential change

Develop and plan possible solutions or change

Implement and evaluate solution or change

Measure and report solution or change results

Recognize and reward team efforts

Typically used by

Research/statistics

1

Creativity/innovation

2

Engineering

Project management

Manufacturing

4

Marketing/sales

Administration/documentation

Servicing/support

Customer/quality metrics

3

Change management

start sidebar
links to other tools

before

  • Information Needs Analysis

  • Benchmarking

  • Fresh Eye

  • Wildest Idea Technique

  • Mental imaging

after

  • Idea Advocate

  • Run-it-by

  • Creativity assessment

  • Why/how charting

  • Presentation

end sidebar

Notes and key points

  • Suggested idea selection criteria and scales:

    Source of Idea

    Potential Use

    Estimated Implementation Costs

    3 = Self (original)

    5 = High

    3 = Acceptable

    2 = Internal

    3 = Medium

    2 = Marginal

    1 = External

    1 = Low

    1 = Unacceptable

  • To select the best idea, multiply columns Source Potential Costs. Rank ideas: highest total = best idea.

Step-by-step procedure

  • STEP 1 The team facilitator reviews the idea borrowing technique with the team and answers any questions participants may have at this point.

  • STEP 2 Participants silently list their ideas on provided paper. Ideas may be best practices, innovations, untried employee suggestions, benchmarking discoveries, and so forth.

  • STEP 3 After some predetermined idea-generation time, the facilitator asks participants to share their ideas. All ideas are listed on a whiteboard or flip charts.

  • STEP 4 The team discusses all ideas and, through consensus, identifies the top 15–20 ideas. The facilitator prepares a matrix containing this final list of ideas. See example List of Ideas to Upgrade Employee Training.

  • STEP 5 Next, the team decides on a set of criteria and associated scales to be used to rate all ideas.

  • STEP 6 All ideas are rated and ranked in accordance with the established criteria, as shown in this example.

  • STEP 7 Finally, the team prepares a presentation for presenting the ideas to upper management.

Example of tool application

List of Ideas to Upgrade Employee Training

Description of Ideas

Source of Idea

Potential Use of Idea

Estimated Implementation Costs

Idea Selection

Total

Rank

Exchange and/or share trainers with other organizations

3

1

2

6

3

Ask employees to review the literature and present on contemporary topics

2

3

3

18

1

Make available internet access for technology update

1

5

1

5

4

Contract university faculty for special topic sessions

1

3

1

3

6

Engage recognized company subject matter experts to present on specific skill areas

1

5

3

15

2

Ask employees to team-develop their own training modules

2

1

2

4

5

Note: (1) Source

Potential

Cost

3 = self

5 = High

3 = acceptable

2 = internal

3 = medium

2 = marginal

1 = external

1 = low

1 = unacceptable

(2) Multiply columns: Source Potential Costs

(3) 18 highest total is best idea.




Six Sigma Tool Navigator(c) The Master Guide for Teams
Six Sigma Tool Navigator: The Master Guide for Teams
ISBN: 1563272954
EAN: 2147483647
Year: 2005
Pages: 326

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net