Troubleshooting Exercises

 
1:

Identify the mistake in the configuration in Example 4-33.

Example 4-33 Configuration for Troubleshooting Exercise 1
  ip nat pool EX1 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 type match-host   ip nat pool EX1A netmask 255.255.255.240   address 172.21.1.33 172.21.1.38   address 172.21.1.40 172.21.1.46   ip nat inside source list 1 pool EX1   ip nat inside source static 10.18.53.210 192.168.1.1   ip nat outside source list 2 pool EX1A   !   access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255   access-list 2 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255  

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

2:

RTR1 in Figure 4-30 connects two internetworks with overlapping addresses.

Figure 4-30. The Internetwork for Troubleshooting Exercise 2

graphics/04fig30.gif

NAT is implemented on the router as configured in Example 4-34, but devices cannot communicate across the router. What is wrong?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Example 4-34 Configuration for Troubleshooting Exercise 2
  interface Ethernet0   ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0   ip nat inside   !   interface Ethernet1   ip address 172.16.255.254 255.255.255.0   ip nat outside   !   router ospf 1   redistribute static metric 10 metric-type 1 subnets   network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0   !   ip nat translation timeout 500   ip nat pool NET1 10.1.1.1 10.1.255.254 netmask 255.255.0.0   ip nat pool NET2 192.168.1.1 192.168.255.254 netmask 255.255.0.0   ip nat inside source list 1 pool NET1   ip nat outside source list 1 pool NET2   !   ip classless   !   ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 Ethernet0   ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 Ethernet1   !   access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255  
3:

Refer to the configurations of Cozumel and Guaymas in Figure 4-21. If the first line of access list 1 in both configurations is removed, what is the result? Can Guaymas and Cozumel still ping each other?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________



Routing TCP[s]IP (Vol. 22001)
Routing TCP[s]IP (Vol. 22001)
ISBN: N/A
EAN: N/A
Year: 2004
Pages: 182

flylib.com © 2008-2017.
If you may any questions please contact us: flylib@qtcs.net