Flylib.com

Books Software

 
 
 

Exploring sources of knowledge and innovation


Exploring sources of knowledge and innovation

When it comes to measuring know-how, no single metric or approach can meet all purposes. Specific measures or indicators are heavily influenced by the nature of operations that exist within each business. So expect variations!

For example, a marketing function in a business could use metrics like a loss of key accounts or churn rate in a year as a measure of the worth of their know-how. While another part of a business like the human resource function may disclose staff turnover as a measure. Other operations may see investment in research and development and list its major clients as far more meaningful. Again, these measures will vary tremendously between profit-driven and not-for-profit enterprises , and are highly idiosyncratic. Therefore, it is imperative that assumptions that drive business reporting are communicated loud and clear. In some cases managers may be immediately attracted to a measure of knowledge and innovation, while on other occasions they will need to shop around.

To help consolidate the general picture, here are the various universal approaches being used in business. These indicators, of course, supplement traditional measures such as profitability, productivity, goodwill and increased sales growth which are currently listed in private sector business accounts. In government, the measures of intangible assets could be provided based on other measures such as productivity gains, capital outlays and savings to help provide a picture of success in innovation and knowledge.

However, such blanket measures at best only give a quick impression ; they can hardly be described as foolproof. It is, therefore, recommended that a series of measures be considered to help promote a more accurate and informative picture of your business landscape. Here are five areas commonly explored in existing reporting on intangible value:

  • Customer capital attempts to place a value on the nature and quality of customer relationships, customer satisfaction rates, growth of customer learning, and involvement and improvement in decision-making and consultation.

  • Human capital measures the current know-how of the people under its control. Jac Fitz-enz describes human capital as ˜that intellectual asset that goes home every night in the minds of employees . A high level of enthusiasm , desire and commitment in the workplace would be an indicator that the human capital or available talent is working in your favour.

  • Intellectual capital comprises listings and perceived values of trade markets, secrets, patents and branding.

  • Relationship capital involves describing important strategic alliances, collaborative relationships, business partnerships, joint ventures and industry associations that could help build reputation and industry standing.

  • Systems performance explores how systems and processes directly or indirectly benefit or generate improved know-how. Measures can include investment in digital technology or how practices have been replicated or improved. Here you find measures of productivity, reduced wastage and efficiency savings, to name but a few.



Selecting your best measures

To assist in the use of suitable measures of intangible value Table 15.1 lists examples of metrics which are commonly appearing in reports . This list is general in nature and does not propose to be all-inclusive. It is designed to give you a sense of the area and a chance to explore choices. The goal here is to promote conversations in your business as to how you could better place the value of your know-how and improve your capacity and the power of your knowledge.

Table 15.1: Examples of intangible metrics

Customer capital

Agreements, contracts and permits

Average response rate to customers

Customer acquisition cost

Customer churn rates

Customer satisfaction

Customer yield

Listings and numbers of customers

Market share

On-line sales per day

Ratio of sales contacts to sales closed

Revenue percentage per customer

Repeat orders

Service awards

Share of new customers

Human capital

Average years of service

Brain drain “ rate and cost of voluntary separations as a percentage of headcount

Employee satisfaction “ percentage of employees scoring in top quartile of job satisfaction survey

Hiring cost

Expert turnover

Hours and $ investment of training/employees

Level and type of education

Literacy levels “ percentage of key employees who have met competence standards

Number of employees

Proportion of support staff to the core business

Profitability per employee

Rookie ratio

Success of employee suggestion programmes

Staff morale “ percentage of employees who indicate concerns with existing culture and climate

Staff turnover

Succession planning “ percentage of key positions with at least one fully qualified person ready

Brand and internet domain names

Computer software and licences

Industry awards

Rights (for example, broadcasting or servicing agreements)

Patents, copyrights, franchises, trademarks (that is, perceived value)

Patents cited by others

Unpatented technology (for example, secret formulas)

Relationship capital

Business partnerships

Contract portfolio

Cross-functional teamwork “ percentage of projects based on interdisciplinary collaboration

Knowledge-enhancing customers and suppliers

Projects being undertaken with others (colleagues, customers and idea groups)

Strategic alliances

Joint ventures

Systems performance

Administration expenses as a percentage of sales

Breakeven time for new product or service development

Cash flow

Cycle times to process services or products

Knowledge reuse hits from learning archives or databases

Investment in IT or knowledge management systems

New product introductions

On-time delivery

Productivity gain due to new ideas or equipment

Research and development expenditure and percentage directly involved

Quarterly sales growth

Sales generated from new products and services

Time to completion of new products

Unit cost for manufacturer or service delivery

The metrics in Table 15.1 have been chosen because it was felt that they need very little or no explanation. The goal here is get you thinking and to explore a wider range of options. Where I found measures very specialized to a particular business or industry, I have left them out. You will also find that some metrics could be listed under a different category depending on your point of view. However, my role here is not to pass any moral or intellectual judgement on their usefulness or categorization but these measures are in use and you might wish to consider some of them in your reporting processes.

The listing of intangible asset measures in Table 15.1 comes from a variety of sources including work by Karl-Eric Sveiby, Jac Fitz-enz, the Saratoga Institute, the US Financial Accounting Standards Board, Kaplan and Norton, Skandia AF and the Danish Agency for Development of Trade and Industry.

As a supplementary comment to Table 15.1, please do not see this listing as complete but go out and discover more for yourself. Like me, you will find it fascinating to see the degree of inconsistency across industries not only between businesses but also, and more alarmingly, between divisions or work locations within the same operation.

For example, where you would expect to find a measure to be used in different parts of a business they often are not and are substituted with another measure. Such inconsistency does not help the cause for improving the case of better reporting. It does on occasion raise more questions than answers. Are the claims being made purely idiosyncratic or are they just self-promotional or, worse still, a misrepresentation of the truth? I suppose when we can track performance over time we will have a better gauge of its true performance in improving knowledge and innovation.