| < Day Day Up > |
Estimating credit risk level in a credit scoring system is based on scoring factors covered by model. Scores are defined according to normative point
average results in a
model values
previous results of the enterprise
Added characteristic scores make the synthetic estimation of the area. All the considered areas' estimations make the total score that defines the economic-financial position class.
The building scoring system process can be split into several stages:
defining aims and assumptions of the system [4]
collecting data of through-the-door population (Janc & Kraska, 2001)
analyzing data and defining a model (set of characteristics and their attributes)
constructing scoring tables
verification of tables.
More information on aspects of building a scoring system can be found in literature (Janc & Kraska, 2001). The scoring tables we present in Tables 5 through 11 are in use in one of the biggest Polish banks. The normatives are changed periodically.
|
Profitability |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
very good |
good |
medium |
weak |
bad |
||||||
|
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
ROS |
ROS > 2S |
7 |
2S>ROS>1S |
5 |
1S>ROS>0,5S |
3 |
0,5S>ROS>0 |
2 |
ROS < 0 |
|
|
2 |
ROA |
ROA > 2A |
5 |
2A>ROA>1A |
4 |
IA>ROA>0,5A |
3 |
0,5A>ROA>0 |
2 |
ROA < 0 |
|
|
3 |
ROE |
ROE > 2E |
5 |
2E>ROE>1E |
4 |
1E>ROE>0,5E |
3 |
0,5E>ROE>0 |
2 |
ROE < 0 |
|
|
Source: The authors, based on scoring methodology (one of 10 biggest Polish banks acc. to "Gazeta Bankowa") |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Table 6: The scoring tables for the rest of the objective factors areas
|
Financial liquidity |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Criteria |
Very good |
good |
medium |
weak |
bad |
||||||
|
Current Value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
current ratio (CR) |
x |
7 |
x |
5 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
|
|
2 |
quick ratio (QR) |
x |
7 |
x |
5 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
|
|
[a] Backing of credit repayment = (cash flow+interests)/(instalments+interests)—forecast. |
|||||||||||
|
Activity |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Criteria |
Very good |
good |
medium |
weak |
bad |
||||||
|
Current Value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
avg. collection period |
x |
4 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
1 |
x |
|
|
2 |
inventory
|
x |
4 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
1 |
x |
|
|
3 |
total assets turnover |
x |
4 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
1 |
x |
|
|
[a] Backing of credit repayment = (cash flow+interests)/(instalments+interests)—forecast. |
|||||||||||
|
Indebtedness |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
very good |
good |
medium |
weak |
bad |
||||||
|
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
current value |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
debt ratio |
x |
7 |
x |
5 |
x |
3 |
x |
2 |
x |
|
|
2 |
constant capital/fixed assets |
x |
5 |
x |
4 |
x |
3 |
x |
1 |
x |
|
|
3 |
backing credit repayment [a] |
x |
5 |
x |
4 |
x |
2 |
x |
1 |
x |
|
|
[a] Backing of credit repayment = (cash flow+interests)/(instalments+interests)—forecast. |
|||||||||||
Table 7:
|
Reliability of the enteroreneur |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
high |
good |
weak |
bad |
|
|
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
reliability of an entrepreneur |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
previous relations with the Bank |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
Market position of an enterprise |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
high |
good |
weak |
bad |
|
|
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
sale possibilities |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
mark of product |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
Competition |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
4 |
customers / suppliers |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Characteristics of the industry (branch) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
high |
good |
weak |
bad |
|
|
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
progress level |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
technology |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Management competence |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
criteria |
high |
good |
weak |
bad |
|
|
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
Pt |
||
|
1 |
experience and competence |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
economic-financial position class |
score |
|---|---|
|
A-1 |
90 – 100 |
|
B-2 |
74 – 89 |
|
C-3 |
57 – 73 |
|
D-4 |
40 – 56 |
|
E-5 |
below 40 |
|
Source: The authors, based on scoring methodology (one of 10 biggest Polish banks acc. to "Gazeta Bankowa") |
|
{% if main.adsdop %}{% include 'adsenceinline.tpl' %}{% endif %}
|
It is stated that current credit capacity of an enterprise is fulfilled under following conditions:
|
|
credit risk class |
previous credit performance |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
economic-financial position class |
regular |
1 – 3 months |
3 – 6 months |
|
A-1 |
I |
II |
III |
|
B-2 |
I |
II |
III |
|
C-3 |
II |
III |
III |
|
D-4 |
III |
III |
IV |
|
E-5 |
III |
IV |
IV |
|
Source: The authors, based on scoring methodology (one of 10 biggest Polish banks acc. to "Gazeta Bankowa") |
|||
|
The enterprise |
XXX |
The branch |
YYY |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A |
qualitative factors |
||
|
area / characteristic |
value of the factors |
score |
|
|
I |
profitability |
12 |
|
|
1 |
return on sales [ROS] |
0,69% |
5 |
|
2 |
return on assets [ROA] |
0,51% |
3 |
|
3 |
return on equity [ROE] |
0,80% |
4 |
|
II |
financial liquidity |
14 |
|
|
1 |
current ratio |
2,2 |
7 |
|
2 |
quick ratio |
1,2 |
7 |
|
III |
activity |
8 |
|
|
1 |
avg. collection period |
28 |
3 |
|
2 |
inventory turnover |
39 |
3 |
|
3 |
total assets turnover |
1,3 |
2 |
|
IV |
Indebtedness |
16 |
|
|
1 |
debt ratio |
0,2 |
7 |
|
2 |
constant capital/ fixed assets |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
backing credit repayment |
1,4 |
4 |
|
B |
quantitative factors |
||
|
area / characteristic |
score |
||
|
I |
reliability |
6 |
|
|
1 |
Reliability of the entepreneur |
3 |
|
|
2 |
previous relations with the Bank |
3 |
|
|
II |
market position of an enterprise |
10 |
|
|
1 |
sale level |
4 |
|
|
2 |
mark of product |
3 |
|
|
3 |
Competition |
2 |
|
|
4 |
customers / suppliers |
1 |
|
|
III |
character of the industry (branch) |
5 |
|
|
1 |
progress level |
2 |
|
|
2 |
Technology |
3 |
|
|
IV |
management competence |
2 |
|
|
1 |
experience and competence |
2 |
|
|
minimum |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
total score for quantitative factors |
50 |
35 |
|
2 |
total score of qualitative factors |
23 |
15 |
|
73 |
|||
|
Economic-financial class |
C-3 |
||
|
minimum score |
|||
|
1 |
quantitative factors |
yes |
|
|
2 |
qualitative factors |
yes |
|
Conclusions:
The enterprise has current credit capacity.
The enterprise isn't indebted in the bank, so far.
Credit risk of the transaction is Class II.
|
Credit Risk Class II:
|
[4] E.g., what is the difference between good and bad customer.
| < Day Day Up > |