[1] G.703, ITU-T Recommendation "Physical/Electrical Characteristics of Hierarchical Digital Interfaces," November 2001. [2] G.704, ITU-T Recommendation "Synchronous Frame Structures Used at 1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s Hierarchical Levels," October 1998. [3] Committee T1, "ISDN Basic Access Interface for Use on Metallic Loops for Application at the Network Side of NT, Layer 1 Specification," Document T1.601-1999. [4] Committee T1, "High-Bit-Rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL)," Technical Report TR-28, February 1994. [5] Bellcore TA-1210 on HDSL. [6] Committee T1, Working Group T1E1.4, "A Draft Technical Report on High-Bit-Rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL)," T1E1.4/96-006, April 22, 1996. [7] ETSI TS 101 135 V1.5.3 (2000-09), "Transmission and Multiplexing (TM); High Bit-Rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) Transmission Systems on Metallic Local Lines; HDSL Core Specification and Applications for Combined ISDN-BA and 2,048 kbit/s transmission," September 2000. [8] vCommittee T1 for Telecommunications ”High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line ”2nd Generation (HDSL2), T1.418-2000. [9] ITU-T Recommendation G.991.1, "High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line (HDSL) Transceivers," October 1998. [10] AT&T Tech Pub 62411. [11] ANSI T1.403-1999, "Network and Customer Installation Interfaces ”DS1 Electrical Interface." [12] ANSI T1.413-1998, "Network to Customer Installation Interfaces ”Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Metallic Interface." [13] ITU-T Recommendation G.991.2, "Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line (SHDSL) Transceivers," February 2001. [14] L. F. Wei, "Trellis-Coded Modulation with Multidimensional Constellations," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-33 (1987): 483. [15] ITU-T Recommendation V.32, "A Family of 2-Wire, Duplex Modems Operating at Data Signalling Rates of Up to 9600 bit/s for Use on the General Switched Telephone Network and on Leased Telephone-Type Circuits," March 1993. [16] Ameritech, "Third Generation HDSL," T1E1.4/95-044, June 5, 1995. [17] Ameritech, "Second Generation HDSL," T1E1.4/96-094, April 22, 1996. [18] Ameritech, "HDSL2 crosstalk Interferer Model," T1E1.4/96-095, April 22, 1996. [19] Pairgain Technologies, "Normative Text for Spectral Compatibility Evaluations," T1E1.4/97-180, June 30, 1997. [20] Pairgain Technologies, "On the Importance of Crosstalk from Mixed Sources," T1E1.4/97-181, May 12, 1997. [21] ADC, Adtran, Level One, Pairgain, "Performance Requirements for HDSL2 Systems," T1E1.4/97-469,December 8, 1997. [22] ADC Telecommunications, "Measured Spectral Compatibility of HDSL2 with Deployed HDSL," T1E1.4/97-434, December 8, 1997. [23] Adtran, "Test Results of HDSL Units with HDSL2 Noise Generator," T1E1.4/97-440R1, December 8, 1997. [24] Adtran, "Simulated Performance of HDSL2 Transceivers," T1E1.4/97-444, December 8, 1997. [25] Pairgain Technologies, "A Modulation Strategy for HDSL2," T1E1.4/96-340, November 11, 1996. [26] Adtran, "A Modulation Technique for CSA Range HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-073, February 3, 1997. [27] Pairgain, "Performance and Spectral Compatibility Comparison of POET PAM and OverCAPped Transmission for HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-179, May 15, 1997. [28] Pairgain, "Performance and Spectral Compatibility of OPTIS HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-237, June 30, 1997. [29] Level One, ADC, Pairgain, "OPTIS PSD Mask and Power Specification for HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-320, September 22, 1997. [30] Cicada Semiconductor, "Performance and Spectral Compatibility of MONET-PAM HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-307, September 22, 1997. [31] Cicada Semiconductor, "Performance and Spectral Compatibiity of MONET (R1) HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-412R1, December 8, 1997. [32] Adtran, Cicada, Siemens, Tellabs, Westell, "Proposal to Break the FEC Logjam for HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-443, December 8, 1997. [33] G. Ungerboeck, "Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase Signals," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-28, No.1, January 1982. [34] G. Ungerboeck, "Trellis-Coded Modulation with Redundant Signal Sets Part I: Introduction," IEEE Communications 25 no. 2 (February 1987): 5 “11. [35] G. Ungerboeck, "Trellis-Coded Modulation with Redundant Signal Sets Part II: State of the Art," IEEE Communications 25 no. 2 (February 1987): 12 “26. [36] Pairgain Technologies, "A 512-State PAM TCM Code for HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-300, September 22, 1997. [37] Adtran, "Performance and Characteristics of One-Dimensional Codes for HDSL2," T1E1.4/97-337 September 25, 1997. [38] Adtran, "Single-Loop HDSL CAP/PAM Comparison," T1E1.4/95-107, August 21, 1995. [39] AT&T Network Systems, "Performance of CAP and PAM for Single Pair HDSL in Presence of SNEXT," T1E1.4/95-106, August 21, 1995. [40] AT&T Network Systems, "Text for HDSL Technical Report Issue 2: CAP Interoperability," June 5, 1995. [41] Adtran, "Proposal for Single-Loop HDSL Using Simple Coded PAM," T1E1.4/96-037, January 26, 1996. [42] AT&T Network Systems, "Single Pair T1 HDSL: Spectral Compatibility with ADSL & Implementation Issues," T1E1.4/96-038, January 26, 1996. |
Top |