Section 6.11. Partitioning Large Log Tables

6.11 Partitioning Large Log Tables

6.11.1 Problem

Log tables are usually very large in that they contain a large number of rows. However, only the most recent events are usually accessed on a frequent basis. You want to create a structure that will take advantage of this fact, allowing the more recent records to be queried in an efficient manner.

6.11.2 Solution

Divide your log table into two tables. They should both have the same structure. One table will hold the most recent events ” for example, the current month's data, and the other table will hold everything else. The table with the most recent data can be referred to as the current log, while the other table is referred to as the archive log. You can then combine the data from the two tables into one row set using the following query:

 SELECT p1, p2, p3 ... pn FROM log_work UNION SELECT p1,p2,p3 ... pn FROM  log_archive 

6.11.3 Discussion

With this kind of a structure, the current log will always be relatively short compared to the archive log. This is good for insert operations, especially if you choose not to index the table. New log entries are always written to the current log table, and the fewer the indices to maintain, the better your performance will be. Because it's relatively small, you may still be able to get decent query performance from the current log table even without an index. The archive log table, on the other hand, should be indexed since it's relatively large.

This combined structure is very efficient for many types of operations, but it requires additional work on the part of your programmers, who must develop regular batch procedures that periodically move older log records from the current log table to the archive table. Still, when performance is the critical goal, this solution can be very beneficial.

The UNION query can be nicely encapsulated into a UNION view. Then you have a view that behaves as a single table even though the underlying implementation uses two tables. Unfortunately, not all database vendors implement UNION views. If you are not using MS SQL Server, you'll have to check your database server's documentation to see if the UNION view option is available to you.

The solution shown in this recipe doesn't apply only to log tables. It can be applied to any type of large table, where only a small fraction of the rows in that table are used consistently and the rest are used infrequently.