Tools for Team Leadership. Delivering the X-Factor in Team eXcellence
Authors: Huszczo G.
Published year: 2003
Pages: 25-26/137
Buy this book on amazon.com >>

Definition of Team

If you are a leader in an organization hoping to benefit from a team concept, it is inevitable that you will be asked to recruit and/or help a group of individuals become a more effective team. The word team comes from the Latin root deuk, which means "to pull." A group of individuals is not a team unless they pull together to reach a common goal. Team tends to be used loosely in many organizations, where management often blithely declares, "We are all one big team." While the sentiment for cooperation may be admirable, such statements do little to produce the behaviors needed to really succeed as a team. Other companies claim to have a team concept, but all they have done is change the word they use to describe a unit from department to team. It's even more disturbing to see organizations anointing any group that meets on a somewhat regular basis as a team. It may be a good idea to share information across individuals and functions, but let's not call a group a team unless it requires the interactive use of the skills of a small group of people working in an interdependent manner to accomplish common goals. If these features do not exist, you don't really have a team.



The Three Types of Teams in Organizations

Three types of teams have had a decent track record in helping organizations succeed: problem-solving teams, self-directed work teams, and leadership teams. Problem-solving teams are probably the most prevalent , though they are known by many names (e.g., rapid improvement teams, employee involvement teams, etc.). Basically they are permanent committees or temporary task forces bringing together the diverse skills, knowledge, and backgrounds of people to identify and analyze organizational problems and make recommendations for what could improve situations. They typically only have the right to make recommendations, while management reserves the right to decide whether to go forward with their ideas. Since the 1980s this type of team has become common in business practice. The old practice of separating the doing of the work from the thinking about the work is finally fading away in most organizations. Workers today are less likely to be required to "check their brains at the plant gate." Managers realize they benefit from the wisdom of those people closer to the action. Your job as a leader may be to facilitate the formation, development, and maintenance of such teams.

During the 1990s and into this century, we have also seen the rise of so-called self-directed work teams (SDWTs). These are groups of employees brought together to make things or deliver services. They are given the power to make decisions, not just recommendations, at least within the parameters established by management. No team operates independently from the realities of the organization that formed it. Thus SDWTs appear quite different depending on the organization in which they reside. Here are some of the ideal characteristics of SDWTs:

  • Being collectively responsible for an identifiable piece of the business

  • Receiving clear metrics daily to verify progress

  • Consisting of members with varying skills, abilities , and problem-solving strategies

  • Exhibiting little or no status differences among members

  • Providing opportunities to interactto meet easily and frequently

  • Establishing interdependent job responsibilities

  • Offering cross-training or at least cross-education for all jobs on the team

  • Having the authority to make decisions on how to get the work done

  • Providing a mixture of individual and group rewards

  • Making available the help and encouragement of external coaches and resource people.

In some companies, SDWTs have reduced or eliminated the need for supervision and have distributed the duties formerly fulfilled by representatives of management across the team members themselves . Oftentimes the team is expected to elect a peer to be the point person interacting with other departments, teams, and levels of management. The organization may provide an area manager who oversees the work of several SDWTs and helps resolve any disciplinary issues that arise within any of the teams. Studies have shown that on average SDWTs outproduce traditional work groups. However, success is dependent on how these teams are implemented. If you are in an organization utilizing the SDWT concept of teams, are you prepared to help them grow and mature? If you have been recently elected team leader, are you prepared to influence your peers?

The use of a leadership team at the top of an organization has also become more prevalent in recent years . The CEO (or facility manager) and his or her direct reports attempt to use their collective wisdom in the development of strategies to run the business. In some unionized settings, a joint steering committee is formed to gain the input of top union leaders and top-level managers. The idea is that one's business strategy must represent the integration of the perspectives of all the functions. Business life is more complex than everno one person can be an expert in so many areas. Allowing each area to run its own function has produced isolated silos and failed to gain the synergy needed to compete in today's marketplace . Teams of leaders are asked to pull together to produce strategic plans and make organizational decisions. Many of the tools provided throughout this book can help make these powerful teams succeed. Chapter 11 is dedicated to examining the unique issues in providing leadership for these leadership teams.


Tools for Team Leadership. Delivering the X-Factor in Team eXcellence
Authors: Huszczo G.
Published year: 2003
Pages: 25-26/137
Buy this book on amazon.com >>

Similar books on Amazon